Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Street Vendors and Directs Implementation of National Policy on Urban Street Vendors. Court Emphasizes Need for Regulation to Balance Vendors' Rights with Public Convenience.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed the rights of street vendors in urban areas, emphasizing their importance in providing affordable goods to the urban poor. The court noted the significant increase in street vendors over the past four decades due to population growth and lack of employment opportunities. It highlighted the dignity of street vendors, who often face harassment from local authorities. The court reviewed previous judgments affirming the right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, while also recognizing the need for reasonable restrictions to ensure public convenience. The court directed the implementation of the National Policy on Urban Street Vendors, 2009, mandating the establishment of Town Vending Committees to regulate street vending activities. It lifted the embargo on High Courts entertaining grievances related to street vending, allowing affected parties to seek redressal. The court emphasized the need for a legal framework to protect the rights of street vendors while balancing the rights of the public to use public spaces without obstruction. The decision aimed to provide a structured approach to street vending, ensuring that vendors can operate legally and without fear of harassment, while also maintaining public order and safety.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights - Right to Trade - Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India - The court recognized the right of street vendors to conduct business on public streets, subject to reasonable restrictions for public convenience and safety. It emphasized the need for proper regulation to balance the rights of vendors and the public interest. Held that the right to trade is fundamental but must be regulated to prevent chaos (Paras 6-7).

B) Urban Development - Regulation of Street Vending - National Policy on Urban Street Vendors, 2009 - The court directed the implementation of the National Policy to provide a legal framework for street vending, ensuring that vendors can operate without harassment while maintaining public order. It mandated the establishment of Town Vending Committees for effective regulation (Paras 10-11).

C) Administrative Law - Role of Municipal Authorities - The court highlighted the responsibility of municipal authorities to create designated vending zones and regulate street vending activities to prevent obstruction and ensure public safety. It ordered that the existing schemes must comply with the new regulations (Paras 12-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether street vendors have a right to conduct business on public streets and the extent of regulation permissible under the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed the implementation of the National Policy on Urban Street Vendors, 2009, and established the framework for regulating street vending activities. It lifted the embargo on High Courts to entertain grievances related to street vending, allowing affected parties to seek redressal. The court emphasized the need for a legal framework to protect the rights of street vendors while ensuring public order and safety.

Law Points

  • fundamental rights
  • street vending
  • reasonable restrictions
  • public interest
  • urban regulation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (SC) (09) 27

Civil Appeal Nos. 4156-4157 of 2002

2013-08-07

G.S. Singhvi

Prashant Bhushan, Shyam Divan, Vijay Hansaria, Anand Grover, Sushil Kumar Jain

Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and another

Municipal Corporation, Greater Mumbai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals concerning the rights of street vendors and their regulation in urban areas.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought recognition of their rights to conduct business as street vendors without harassment.

Filing Reason

The case was filed due to ongoing harassment and lack of regulation for street vendors by municipal authorities.

Previous Decisions

Several judgments had previously addressed the rights of street vendors, but the situation remained unresolved.

Issues

Whether street vendors have a constitutional right to conduct business on public streets. What regulations are permissible to balance the rights of street vendors with public interest.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued for the recognition of their rights and the need for a regulatory framework to protect them. The respondents contended that street vendors cannot occupy public spaces indiscriminately and that regulation is necessary.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while street vendors have a fundamental right to trade under Article 19(1)(g), this right is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6) to ensure public convenience and safety. The need for a structured regulatory framework was emphasized to balance the rights of vendors with the rights of the public.

Judgment Excerpts

The right to carry on trade or business mentioned in Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, on street pavements, if properly regulated cannot be denied. The court directed that the 2009 Policy should be implemented throughout the country. The existing schemes must comply with the new regulations.

Procedural History

The case involved multiple civil appeals concerning the rights of street vendors and their regulation. The Supreme Court reviewed previous judgments and directives related to street vending and addressed ongoing issues faced by street vendors in urban areas.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 19(1)(g), Article 19(6)
  • National Policy on Urban Street Vendors: Section 10.1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses UPSC Appeals on Age Relaxation for Contract Employees — Court affirms inclusion of contract employees under age relaxation provisions. The term 'employees of MCD' was interpreted to include all employees, thus entitling cont...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Compensation Calculation Under Land Reforms Act Due to Lack of Merit. Compensation Calculated in Accordance with Statutory Provisions and Interest Rates Upheld as Statutorily Mandated.