Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals for Lack of Merit. Appeals found to be devoid of merit and dismissed without costs.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved appeals filed by the State of U.P against Manoj Misra and others. The Supreme Court of India, in its civil appellate jurisdiction, reviewed the records and heard the arguments presented by the learned counsel for the appellants. Upon consideration, the court determined that the appeals lacked merit and were therefore dismissed. The court did not impose any costs associated with the dismissal. The decision was made on January 18, 2013, by Justices H.L. Dattu and Ranjan Gogoi.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Dismissal of Appeals - Lack of Merit - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - The court found the appeals to be devoid of any merit and dismissed them accordingly, with no order as to costs. Held that the appeals did not warrant further consideration (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeals had any merit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals for lack of merit, with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Civil appellate jurisdiction
  • dismissal of appeals
  • lack of merit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (SC) (01) 59

Civil Appeal Nos. 87-88 of 2013

2013-01-18

H.L. Dattu, Ranjan Gogoi

State of U.P, Thr. Prin.Secy., Irrig. & Anr.

Manoj Misra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appellate litigation

Remedy Sought

Dismissal of appeals

Issues

Merit of the appeals

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the appellants argued for the appeals

Ratio Decidendi

The appeals were found to lack merit and were dismissed accordingly.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeals, being devoid of any merit, are liable to be dismissed and are dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed and subsequently heard by the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Wildlife Protection Case — Restores Cognizance of Offence Against Accused.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Homeopathic Doctors for Pay Scale Adjustment. The court found that the diploma in homeopathy was equivalent to a degree, thus entitling the appellants to the same pay scale as degree holders under relevant government no...