Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Termination of Employees by VSNL — Maintains Non-Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment addressed a series of appeals concerning the termination of employees from Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL), a company that transitioned from a government entity to a private corporation following disinvestment. The appellants, former employees of the Overseas Communication Service (OCS), challenged their terminations, arguing that VSNL remained under government control and thus should be subject to writ jurisdiction. The court examined the historical context of VSNL's formation, its shareholding structure post-disinvestment, and the nature of its functions. It was noted that the government held only 26.12% of shares in VSNL, which did not constitute sufficient control to classify it as a State under Article 12 of the Constitution. The court also considered the nature of the functions performed by VSNL, concluding that while it provided essential communication services, it did not perform a public function in the sense required for writ jurisdiction. The court ultimately dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower courts' decisions that the writ petitions were not maintainable against VSNL.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability of Writ Petitions - Article 12 of the Constitution of India - The court held that VSNL, despite partial government ownership, does not qualify as a State or other authority under Article 12, thus writ petitions against it are not maintainable. The court emphasized the need for pervasive government control for an entity to be classified as a State under Article 12 (Paras 39-44).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether VSNL is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that VSNL is not a State or other authority under Article 12, and thus the writ petitions against it are not maintainable.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction
  • maintainability of writ petitions
  • public function
  • Article 12
  • shareholding control
  • employment termination
  • statutory force of service rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (SC) (04) 118

Civil Appeal No. 2147 of 2010 and others

2014-03-10

Surinder Singh Nijjar

T.N. Razdan, K.S. Chauhan, C.U. Singh

Jatya Pal Singh & Ors., M.P. Singh, Vijay Thakur, Ram Prakash

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals challenging the termination of employees from VSNL.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of employment and recognition of writ jurisdiction against VSNL.

Filing Reason

Termination of employees post disinvestment of VSNL.

Previous Decisions

Writ petitions dismissed by the Delhi High Court and Bombay High Court.

Issues

Whether VSNL is a State or other authority under Article 12 of the Constitution. Whether the writ petitions against VSNL are maintainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that VSNL remains under government control and thus amenable to writ jurisdiction. Respondents contended that VSNL is not a State or other authority and the writ petitions are not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that for an entity to be classified as a State under Article 12, it must be under pervasive government control, which VSNL was not post-disinvestment.

Judgment Excerpts

The court emphasized the need for pervasive government control for an entity to be classified as a State under Article 12. We are unable to accept the aforesaid submissions. The conclusion is inescapable that TCL cannot be said to be other authority within Article 12 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

The case involved multiple appeals against the dismissal of writ petitions by the Delhi and Bombay High Courts concerning the termination of employees from VSNL.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Telegraph Act, 1885: Section 4
  • Constitution of India: Article 12, Article 19(1)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Rule on Withholding Pension in West Bengal Services — Validity of Rule 10(1) Confirmed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MCOCA Application in NIA Case Involving CPI (M) Organized Crime Syndicate. Prior Approval Under Section 23(1)(i) of MCOCA Act Upheld as Cognizance of Predicate Offences Was Taken Before Approval Date.