Supreme Court Upholds Amendment to Official Language Act — Validity of Urdu as Second Official Language Affirmed. The court confirmed that the State Legislature can adopt additional languages as official languages alongside Hindi under Article 345.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the challenge to the constitutionality of the Uttar Pradesh Official Language (Amendment) Act, 1989, which declared Urdu as a second official language alongside Hindi. The U.P. Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, the appellant, had previously contested the validity of the U.P. Official Language (Amendment) Ordinance, 1983, which was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. Following this, the appellant filed another writ petition against the 1989 Amendment Act and the notification issued by the State Government. The Division Bench of the High Court had differing opinions, leading to a referral to a third judge, who upheld the validity of the Amendment Act. The matter was escalated to the Supreme Court, which examined the legislative powers under Articles 345 and 347 of the Constitution. The court concluded that the State Legislature is not barred from adopting additional languages as official languages, even after declaring Hindi as the official language. The judgment emphasized the need for a flexible language policy that accommodates the linguistic diversity of the State. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the 1989 Amendment Act, affirming the constitutionality of Urdu as a second official language.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Official Language - Validity of Second Official Language - Uttar Pradesh Official Language Act, 1951, Articles 345, 347 of the Constitution - The court held that the State Legislature has the power to adopt any language in use in the State as an official language in addition to Hindi, and the 1989 Amendment Act is constitutional. The court reasoned that the explicit mention of Hindi does not preclude the adoption of other languages, allowing for a flexible language policy (Paras 25-34).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly can declare Urdu as the second official language through the 1989 Amendment Act after declaring Hindi as the official language in 1951.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Official Language (Amendment) Act, 1989, affirming that the State Legislature can declare additional languages as official languages alongside Hindi under Article 345 of the Constitution.

Law Points

  • Official language
  • constitutional validity
  • legislative power
  • excessive delegation
  • language policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (SC) (09) 91

Civil Appeal No.459 of 1997

R.M. Lodha, CJI

Shyam Divan

U.P. Hindi Sahitya Sammelan

State of U.P.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the constitutionality of the Uttar Pradesh Official Language (Amendment) Act, 1989.

Remedy Sought

U.P. Hindi Sahitya Sammelan sought to strike down the 1989 Amendment Act and the notification declaring Urdu as a second official language.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the adoption of Urdu as a second official language was unconstitutional.

Previous Decisions

The Allahabad High Court had dismissed earlier petitions challenging the constitutionality of related ordinances and amendments.

Issues

Constitutional validity of the 1989 Amendment Act Legislative power of the State to adopt additional official languages

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the adoption of Hindi as the official language precluded the recognition of any other language as official. The respondent contended that the State Legislature has the authority to adopt additional languages as official languages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the explicit recognition of Hindi as the official language does not limit the State Legislature's power to adopt other languages in use as official languages, ensuring a flexible approach to language policy.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the State Legislature has the power to adopt any language in use in the State as an official language in addition to Hindi. Nothing in Article 345, in our view, bars declaring one or more of the languages in use in the State, in addition to Hindi, as the second official language.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition challenging the 1989 Amendment Act after the Allahabad High Court dismissed an earlier petition regarding the 1983 Ordinance. The matter was referred to a third judge due to differing opinions in the Division Bench, leading to the Supreme Court's involvement.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh Official Language Act, 1951: Section 2, Section 3
  • Uttar Pradesh Official Language (Amendment) Act, 1989:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Dismissal of Workmen in Industrial Dispute Case — Validity of Enquiry Confirmed.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in IPC Murder Case Due to Lack of Premeditation. Conviction Converted to Culpable Homicide under Section 304 IPC as Incident Occurred in Heat of Passion.