Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeals in Waqf Property Dispute — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Affirmed. The suit for eviction against the tenant relating to waqf property is triable by the civil court as it is not covered by the disputes specified in Sections 6 and 7 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a suit for eviction filed by the Munnerul Islam Madrasa Committee against the appellant, Faseela M., claiming that the property in question was waqf property and that the appellant was a tenant. The appellant contested the characterization of the property as waqf and challenged the jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal. Initially, the Waqf Tribunal directed the plaint to be returned to the civil court but later recalled this order, asserting its jurisdiction over the matter. The appellant subsequently filed two revision petitions in the High Court, both of which were dismissed, leading to the present appeals. The core legal issue was whether the eviction suit was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal or if it could be tried by the civil court. The Supreme Court analyzed Sections 6 and 7 of the Waqf Act, 1995, alongside Sections 83 and 85, which delineate the powers and jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal. The Court referred to the precedent set in Ramesh Gobindram, which clarified that eviction suits concerning waqf properties are not covered by the exclusive jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal and must be adjudicated by civil courts. The Court ultimately restored the Waqf Tribunal's original order directing the plaint to be returned to the civil court, allowing the civil court to proceed with the suit. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Waqf Law - Jurisdiction of Waqf Tribunal - Exclusive Jurisdiction - Waqf Act, 1995, Sections 6, 7 - The court held that the suit for eviction against the tenant relating to waqf property is triable by the civil court as it is not covered by the disputes specified in Sections 6 and 7 of the Act. The decision in Ramesh Gobindram was reaffirmed, establishing that civil courts retain jurisdiction over eviction suits concerning waqf properties (Paras 11-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit for eviction by the landlord against the tenant relating to waqf property is triable by the civil court or lies within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order of the High Court and restored the Waqf Tribunal's order dated 18.09.2010, directing the civil court to proceed with the suit.

Law Points

  • exclusive jurisdiction
  • Waqf Tribunal
  • civil court
  • eviction suit
  • waqf property
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (SC) (03) 60

Civil Appeal Nos. 4250-4252 of 2014

2014-03-31

R.M. Lodha, Kurian Joseph

Faseela M.

Munnerul Islam Madrasa Committee & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding eviction from waqf property

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal

Filing Reason

Eviction suit filed by the landlord claiming the property as waqf

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging Waqf Tribunal's jurisdiction

Issues

Jurisdiction of Waqf Tribunal vs. Civil Court Applicability of Sections 6 and 7 of the Waqf Act

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the property is not waqf and challenged the Tribunal's jurisdiction. Respondent contended that the Tribunal has jurisdiction under Section 85 of the Waqf Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The suit for eviction against the tenant relating to waqf property is triable by the civil court as it is not covered by the disputes specified in Sections 6 and 7 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

Judgment Excerpts

The suit for eviction against the tenant relating to a waqf property is exclusive triable by the civil court as such suit is not covered by the disputes specified in Sections 6 and 7 of the Act. The order passed by the Waqf Tribunal on 19.09.2010 is also set aside.

Procedural History

The Waqf Tribunal initially directed the plaint to be returned to the civil court, then recalled this order asserting jurisdiction. The appellant filed revision petitions in the High Court, which were dismissed, leading to the current appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Waqf Act, 1995: 6, 7, 83, 85
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Conviction Under TADA Act Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. The court found the prosecution's narrative implausible and the evidence insufficient to uphold the conviction under Section 5 of the TADA Act.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO and IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 366-A ...