Supreme Court Modifies High Court Judgment on Regularization of Daily-Wage Employees in Government Press. The court directed the regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D posts as per the 1985 Rules, emphasizing compliance with previous Supreme Court orders.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the regularization of daily-wage employees in the Government Printing Press, arising from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court. The High Court had directed the Director of Government Press to consider regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D as per rules from December 2001. The daily-wage employees had been engaged from 1985 to 1991, and a writ petition was filed in 1992 seeking regularization. The High Court initially framed a scheme for regularization, which was challenged in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court noted that the government had proposed regularization in 1997, allowing for age relaxation for eligible candidates. However, despite these directives, no significant action was taken for years. In 2001, the government issued a communication urging compliance with the Supreme Court's order, but instead of filling Group-D posts, it attempted to fill the post of 'Gatemen' with different qualifications. The court highlighted that the post of 'Gatemen' was not part of the Group-D cadre and that the qualifications for this post were not aligned with the existing rules. The court ultimately directed that vacancies in Group-D/Class-IV posts be filled from daily-wage employees in service as of 12.11.1997, adhering to the 1985 Rules, and mandated the completion of this process within specified timelines. The judgment was modified to ensure compliance with these directives, with no costs awarded.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Regularization of Daily-Wage Employees - Compliance with Supreme Court Orders - Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Daily Wages Appointments on Group-D Posts Rules, 2001 - The court directed the regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D posts as per the 1985 Rules, emphasizing the need for compliance with previous Supreme Court orders and the importance of filling vacancies from eligible daily-wage employees as of 12.11.1997. Held that the process must be completed within specified timelines without disturbing existing regular employees (Paras 18-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the selection for the post of 'Gatemen' should be conducted as per the 2001 Rules or the previous government instructions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's judgment, directing the regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D posts as per the 1985 Rules and mandating the completion of the process within specified timelines.

Law Points

  • Regularization of employees
  • Group-D posts
  • compliance with court orders
  • age relaxation
  • service rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (SC) (03) 9

Civil Appeal Nos. 3339-3340 of 2014

2014-03-07

Kurian Joseph, H.L. Gokhale

Pramod Swarup, Pareena Swarup, Alka Sinha, S.R. Singh, D.N. Dubey, Avnish Singh, Rajesh Srivastava, Sushant K. Yadav, Manoj Swarup, Lalita Kohli, Abhishek Swarup, Yatish Mohan, Vinita Y. Mohan, Archana Gaur, Anand Bali, N. Annapoorani, Avijit Bhushan

Director, Printing and Stationary Department, U.P. Government Press and others

Moti Lal and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the regularization of daily-wage employees in the Government Printing Press.

Remedy Sought

Regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D posts.

Filing Reason

Challenge to the High Court's judgment directing regularization as per 2001 Rules.

Previous Decisions

High Court directed regularization based on a scheme framed in 1993 and subsequent government decisions.

Issues

Whether the selection for the post of 'Gatemen' should be conducted as per the 2001 Rules or previous government instructions. Whether the daily-wage employees should be regularized in Group-D posts.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that 'Gatemen' is a separate cadre with different qualifications. Respondents contended that 'Gatemen' is interchangeable with Group-D/Class-IV posts.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for compliance with previous Supreme Court orders regarding the regularization of daily-wage employees and clarified the qualifications for Group-D posts.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge is to the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad wherein the Director of Government Press was directed to consider regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D as per Rules promulgated in December, 2001. The court directed the regularization of daily-wage employees in Group-D posts as per the 1985 Rules.

Procedural History

The appeals arose from the judgment of the High Court directing regularization of daily-wage employees, which was challenged in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh Group-‘D’ Employees Service Rules:
  • Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Daily Wages Appointments on Group-D Posts Rules: Rule 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Notified Person Under Special Courts Act, Holding Attached Property Cannot Be Sold in Debt Recovery Execution Without Custodian's Consent. Attachment Under Section 3(3) of Special Courts Act, 1992 Prevails Over Ce...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Land Acquisition Notifications — Invalidity Due to Delay in Public Notice.