Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Khorposh Allowance Discontinuance — Validity of Sanad Challenged. The Sanad was determined to be an executive act and not law, thus allowing its discontinuance by the Government of Orissa.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the discontinuance of a Khorposh allowance granted to the appellant, Rajkumar Narsingh Pratap Singh Deo, by the Ruler of Dhenkanal State. The Ruler had issued a Sanad on March 1, 1931, providing a monthly allowance of Rs. 500 and certain lands to the appellant. Following the merger of Dhenkanal with the Dominion of India on January 1, 1948, the Government of Orissa took over administration and discontinued the allowance from May 1, 1949. The appellant filed a suit challenging this discontinuance, claiming the Sanad constituted law under Article 372 of the Constitution. The trial court dismissed the suit, and the High Court upheld this decision on appeal. The appellant contended that the Sanad was a law and should continue under the provisions of the Constitution and the Order issued by the Orissa Government. The respondent argued that the Sanad was an executive act and could be discontinued similarly. The Supreme Court analyzed the nature of the Sanad, concluding it was a personal gift without legislative character, thus affirming the validity of its discontinuance. The court emphasized that the customary law requiring maintenance did not prevent the respondent from determining the adequacy of such maintenance. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the High Court's decision without costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Validity of Sanad - Sanad as Executive Act - Article 372 of the Constitution - The Sanad granted by the Ruler of Dhenkanal was determined to be an executive act and not law, as it lacked legislative elements and was a personal grant under customary law. The court held that the discontinuance of the cash allowance by the Government of Orissa was valid as it could be modified or cancelled by an executive act (Paras 1-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Sanad issued in favour of the appellant constituted existing law under Article 372 of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision that the Sanad was an executive act and not law, thus validating the discontinuance of the cash allowance.

Law Points

  • Khorposh allowance
  • Sanad validity
  • executive act
  • legislative act
  • customary law
  • Article 372
  • Order 31 of 1948
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 133/1963

1964-03-09

P. B. Gajendragadkar, K. N. Wanchoo, C. Shah, N. Rajagopala Ayyangar, S. M. Sikri

M. C. Setalvad, R. K. Garg, M. K. Ramamurthi, D. P. Singh, S. C. Agarwala, S. V. Gupte, Ganapathy Iyer, R. H. Dhebar

Rajkumar Narsingh Pratap Singh Deo

State of Orissa and Another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the discontinuance of a Khorposh allowance by the Government of Orissa.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to reinstate the discontinued cash allowance.

Filing Reason

The appellant alleged that the discontinuance was illegal and unconstitutional.

Previous Decisions

The trial court dismissed the suit, and the High Court upheld this decision.

Issues

Validity of the Sanad as law under Article 372 Nature of the grant as executive or legislative act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the Sanad constituted law and should continue under Article 372. The respondent contended that the Sanad was an executive act and could be discontinued.

Ratio Decidendi

The Sanad issued by an absolute monarch was determined to be an executive act without legislative character, allowing for its discontinuance by the successor government.

Judgment Excerpts

The Sanad in question had no legislative element in any of its provisions and was a gift pure and simple. The gift therefore, was an executive act of the Ruler and did not amount to law. The customary law requiring provision to be made for the maintenance of the appellant is in force.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit in the Court of Subordinate Judge, which was dismissed. An appeal was made to the High Court, which upheld the dismissal. The appellant then obtained a certificate from the High Court to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 366(10), Article 372
  • Extra Foreign Jurisdiction Act, 1947: Section 3(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Untrained Teacher's Admission to Postal D.Ed. Course — Violation of Natural Justice. Admission Cancellation Set Aside as Petitioner Was Not Granted Hearing Before Cancellation, and Course Completion Certifi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Property Dispute Due to Illegal Induction of Tenant. Induction of Tenant During Litigation Violates Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.