High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous Due to Expiry of Allotment Period. The writ petition became infructuous as the allotment period for the forest coup had expired, rendering the challenge to the Deputy Conservator's order moot.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a registered cooperative society, Balpur Vibhag Jungal Kamdar Sahakari Mandali Ltd., challenging an order from the Deputy Conservator of Forests dated 19th December 1986, which denied the society possession of coup No.12, known as Kosambdi, in the Vyara range. The society, composed of scheduled tribe members residing in forest villages, had applied for the allotment of the coup for the year 1986-87, which was granted under an order dated 15th November 1986. However, a subsequent communication on 19th December 1986 informed the society that possession would not be handed over until further orders. The society sought judicial intervention, and interim relief was granted on 13th March 1987, allowing them to take possession of the coup. As the allotment period had long expired, the court found that the matter had become infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. The court ruled that no further proceedings were warranted given the circumstances, and thus the rule was discharged.

Headnote

A) Writ Jurisdiction - Infructuous Petition - Dismissal of Writ Petition - Constitution of India, 1950 - The writ petition was filed challenging the order of the Deputy Conservator of Forests regarding possession of a forest coup. The court held that since the allotment period had expired and interim relief had been granted, the matter had become infructuous and thus dismissed the petition. Held that no further adjudication was necessary (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Conservator of Forests has become infructuous due to the expiry of the allotment period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the expiry of the allotment period for the forest coup, ruling that no further adjudication was necessary.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Infructuous petitions
  • Allotment of forest coup
  • Cooperative societies
  • Interim relief
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Special Civil Application No 754 of 1987

1996-10-18

MR. JUSTICE S.K. KESHOTE

MR ND GOHIL

Balpur Vibhag Jungal Kamdar Sahakari Mandali Ltd.

Conservator of Forests

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an administrative order regarding possession of a forest coup.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought possession of coup No.12 as per the allotment.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the order denying possession of the coup.

Previous Decisions

Interim relief was granted allowing possession, but the allotment period expired.

Issues

Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the expiry of the allotment period.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued for possession based on the allotment order. The respondents maintained that the order was valid and possession could not be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a writ petition becomes infructuous when the underlying issue has ceased to exist, particularly when the allotment period has expired.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner-society was informed that the possession of the coup is not to be given to the petitioner-society till further orders. In view of this fact, nothing now survives to be decided in this case and this Special Civil Application, in fact, and substance, by passing of time, has become infructuous.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Conservator of Forests on 19th December 1986. Interim relief was granted on 13th March 1987, allowing possession of the coup. The matter was heard and decided on 18th October 1996.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs Land Tribunal to Issue Occupancy Certificate Pursuant to Division Bench Order in Land Reforms Case. Writ of Mandamus Issued for Compliance with Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against NCLAT Order Affirming Admission of Section 9 Insolvency Application. The appeal concerns whether unpaid amounts under an EPC contract constitute operational debt under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ...