Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Assessee in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Appeal Due to Denial of Cross-Examination. CESTAT Majority Order Setting Aside Duty Demand of Rs 4,16,73,971 Upheld as Transporter's Statement Was Sole Basis and Cross-Examination Was Wrongly Refused Under Principles of Natural Justice....

The dispute arose out of central excise proceedings initiated against a processor of man-made fabrics and its director following searches on 21 May 2002. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partly Allows Writ Petitioners in Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme Matter. Writ Petition Treated as Representation and Union Finance Ministry Directed to Decide Within Four Weeks to Ensure Scheme Benefits Percolate....

The dispute arose from the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme introduced by the Government of India through the Ministry of Finance. The petitioners, two business entities through their proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Holds Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's Negligence Finding Perverse in Road Accident Compensation Appeal. Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim Overlooked Material Oral Evidence and Misinterpreted Accident Sketch, and Higher Duty of Care Applied to Tipper Truck Driver....

Background: The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the appellant sought compensation for injuries allegedly caused by a tipper truck bearing registration No. GDZ 694. The Motor Accident Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Concerning Deduction Under Section 43B for Sales Tax Set-Off. Sales Tax Set-Off Amount of Rs.7,06,590 Treated as Deemed Payment by Legal Fiction and Allowed as Deduction Under Section 43B of Income Tax Act, 1961....

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from Assessment Year 1988-89. The appellant assessee, a company formerly known as E. Merck (India) Ltd., had claimed a deduction of Rs.7,06,590 under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Process Against Deputy General Manager in Food Safety Act Case as Nominated Person Was Liable. First Proviso to Section 66 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Rule 2.5.1 of Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011 Shield Non-Nominated Officer from Prosecution Absent Allegations of Consent, Connivance or Neglect....

Background: This criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arose from a prosecution initiated by the Food Safety Officer, Raigad Food and Drug Administration again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Allows Appeals of Convicted Accused in Murder Case Due to Untrustworthy Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code Set Aside as Evidence of Interested Witnesses Failed to Inspire Confidence....

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, dealt with three criminal appeals arising out of a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nagpur, which had convicted three accused p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines PIL Against Unauthorized Construction in Coastal Regulation Zone and Inaction by Village Panchayat. Court Finds Prima Facie Dereliction of Duty by Sarpanch for Not Exercising Section 64 Powers to Stop Construction and Considers Action Under Section 50(4) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994....

This public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by a fisherman and social activist from Calangute, Goa, challenging unauthorized construction in a Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) area and the inaction o...