All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act....

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition Imposed by Education Officer for Salary from Date of Approval Instead of Appointment. Held that Salary Must Be Paid from Date of Appointment When Approval is Granted Subsequently....

The petitioners, Smt. Shradhdha Ashok Parab (Petitioner No.1), Kasal Panchkroshi Shikshan Sanstha (Petitioner No.2), and New English School, Kasal (Petitioner No.3), filed a writ petition before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Shikshan Sevak for Salary from Date of Appointment in Maharashtra Schools Act Case. Education Officer's Condition to Pay Salary from Date of Approval Quashed as Appointment Was Made After Following Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977....

The petitioner, Vikas Pandit Patil, was appointed as Shikshan Sevak by Respondent No. 4 (Higher Education Society, Shirala) at Respondent No. 5 School (Samaj Vikas Madhyamik and Uccha Madhyamak Vidyal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Shalarth Identity for Teacher Despite Deputy Director's Disapproval of Appointment Approval. Deputy Director of Education Cannot Question Validity of Appointment After Approval by Education Officer Under Maharashtra Education Act....

The petitioners, including a teacher (Petitioner No.1) and the school management, sought directions to the Deputy Director of Education, Pune, to grant Shalarth Identity to the teacher and include his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award — Charitable Trust Held to be 'Industry' Under Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court found that the trust's systematic and organized activities for employee benefit fall within the definition of industry, affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction....

The petitioner, Seth Motishaw Lalbaug Jain Charities, a charitable trust, filed a writ petition challenging an award passed by the Industrial Tribunal. The trust contended that it does not fall within...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to Be Identical, Indicating Non-Application of Mind by Adjudicating Authority....

The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged an assessment order dated 31 March 2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) by the Assistant Commis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act, Holding That Section 14 Orders Are Administrative and Not Subject to Appeal Under Section 18. The court clarified that the remedy against a Section 14 order lies only by way of writ petition under Article 226/227, and the DRT has no power to review or recall its own Section 14 order....

The Bombay High Court dealt with a batch of writ petitions and interim applications challenging orders passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Development Agreement — Failure to Consider Limitation and Lack of Evidence of Agreement. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge succeeds as award based on letter dated November 4, 2003 read with unregistered document suffers from patent illegality and perversity....

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award dated August 5, 2017, which had granted specific performance of a development agreement in favor of the respondent, Nilkanth Enterprise, against the p...