Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship....

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemption under Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956....

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 22.12.2015 issued by the Executive Engineer (Union ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Clarification Order and Section 60(8) of KVAT Act — Upholds Tax Rate of 14.5% on Diapers, Under-pads, and Sanitary Napkins. Commissioner's Clarification Overruling Advance Ruling Authority Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 60(8) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003....

The petitioner, M/s Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Care Private Limited, a manufacturer of 'All-in-one Diapers, Under-pads and Sanitary Napkins', challenged a Clarification Order dated 11.09.2014 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Dispute — Alternative Civil Remedy Available. Petitioner's representations to Deputy Commissioner for action against private respondents cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction when civil suit for injunction is already pending....

The petitioner, R. Lakshman @ Lakshmana Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in lapse of proceedings....

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated 07/06/2016 passed by a learned single Judge in W.P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking Compensation for Electricity-Related Losses Against BESCOM — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical faults and transformer failures rejected as no evidence of negligence or breach of duty by the electricity supply company was provided....

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by individuals against the Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM) and others, seeking compensation for losses allegedly caused by electrical ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions for Compensation in Electricity Supply Disputes — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical accidents and improper billing were rejected as the court found no statutory violation or breach of duty by BESCOM under the Electricity Act, 2003....

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various individuals against the Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM) and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Refund Claim of CENVAT Credit as Time-Barred Under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962 — Limitation Period Starts from Date of Payment of Duty, Not from Date of Final Assessment....

The petitioner, M/s. Supertron Electronics Private Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the Order-in-Original dated 31.5.2016 passed b...