Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Chandrakant Baburao Musane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for the murder of his father-in-law under Sections 302, 498-A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in MSMED Act Arbitration Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner's alternative remedy by way of appeal was availed and withdrawn, and no grounds for review exist....

The petitioner, Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act), had contracts with the respondent, Union of India (throu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition in Favor of Wife Due to Hardship and Inconvenience. Wife's Unemployment and Distance of 223 km Outweigh Husband's Convenience Under Section 24 CPC....

The applicant-wife, Trishala Vaibhav Jain, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.24 of 2021 filed by the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim for Child Death — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Established. MSRTC held vicariously liable for death of 10-year-old student hit by bus at bus-stand; compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with 8% interest upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a 10-year-old boy, Parikshit Bhosale, who died after being hit by a State Transport bus owned by the Maharashtra State Road Transpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment....

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for wife's murder set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Ramkisan Vishnu Nagare, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Sunita, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case ...