Bombay High Court

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credibl...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's De...

Bombay High Court

Home Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reservation Notification for Sarpanch Posts Exceeding 50% Limit in Nagpur District. Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes in Gram Panchayat Sarpanch Elections Cannot Exceed 50% of Total Posts as per Section 30(4)(a) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959....

The petitioner, Gunwanta s/o Pundlik Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Jalalkheda in September 2018 for a five-year term. On 5 March 2020, the Rural Development Department issued a notifica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Gratuity Order — Transfer with Lien Does Not Break Continuous Service Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer Liable to Pay Gratuity Based on Higher Pay Scale of Parent Organization....

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 25/11/2019 passed by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Order — Employer Held Liable for Full Gratuity Despite Employee's Transfer to Another Corporation. Lien Maintained with Original Employer During Transfer, Making It the 'Employer' Under Section 2(f) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972....

The Petitioner, Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 25/11/2019 passed by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Held that reservation for garden does not automatically lapse upon non-development within 10 years; however, failure to acquire land within reasonable time renders reservation invalid and owner entitled to compensation or release....

The petitioners, Runwal Township Pvt. Ltd. and its director Kishorkumar Jain, owned land in Mumbai that was reserved for a garden in the Development Plan. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Reservation of land for public purpose does not automatically lapse upon non-development within plan period; landowner must be given opportunity to develop or be compensated under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to MHADA Acquisition of Cessed Buildings for Redevelopment. Tenants Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition and Tender Process Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976....

The petitioners, tenants of Dattatraya Buildings in Mumbai, filed writ petitions challenging the acquisition of the buildings by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Calculation Dispute — Service Rules Cap on Maximum Gratuity Upheld Over Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer's decision to restrict gratuity to 20 months' pay by combining two service spells was valid under Rule 84 of the Service Rules, and the Controlling Authority's order directing additional gratuity was set aside....

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Calculation Dispute — Service Rules Cap on Maximum Gratuity Upheld Over Payment of Gratuity Act. Employer's restriction of gratuity to 8 years in second spell due to combined service exceeding 20-month cap under Rule 84 of Service Rules was valid and not violative of Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972....

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Ashok Vilas Bargal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Newasa, for the murder of Seema, wife of Sanjay Sitaram Jadhav, under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubt Over Cause of Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Hammer Blow as Cause of Death, and Eye Witness Testimony Was Contradictory....

The appellant, Satish Suresh Shrisundar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No.200/2014 on 29.12.2016 for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323 of th...

Previous Next

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

Bombay High Court

Sort by:

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Gratuity Order — Transfer with Lien Does Not Break Continuous Service Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer Liable to Pay Gratuity Based on Higher Pay Scale of Parent Organization....

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to MHADA Acquisition of Cessed Buildings for Redevelopment. Tenants Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition and Tender Process Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976....

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt....

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubt Over Cause of Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Hammer Blow as Cause of Death, and Eye Witness Testimony Was Contradictory....

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Upholds Respondent's Bail in UAP Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Judi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case Concerning Excise Duty Valuation. The unpai...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Related Party Status in IBC Proceedings — Clarifies D...