Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Karnataka State Financial Corporation in Seniority Dispute Between Direct Recruits and Promotees. Direct Recruit's Seniority Over Promotees from Date of Appointment Upheld Based on State Government Instruction Binding Under Section 39 of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951....

The petitioner, M.A. Murthy, a direct recruit as Manager (F&A) in Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC), sought seniority over promotees who were appointed on the same date, relying on a State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Upholding Withholding of Pension. Challenge centres on validity of departmental enquiry initiated post-retirement under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957....

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was filed by a retired Revenue Inspector challenging the order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal which dismissed his appli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Review Petitions Against Orders in Writ Petitions Involving Income Tax Assessments of Cooperative Societies. Petitioners Seek Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC Read with Section 114 CPC of Orders Passed on 05.02.2020 and 11.02.2020....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of review petitions filed by various cooperative societies seeking review of orders dated 05.02.2020 and 11.02.2020 passed in corresponding writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to No-Confidence Motion Notice During Model Code of Conduct. MCC Guidelines Not Applicable to Statutory Duty of Convening No-Confidence Meeting Under Section 49(1) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993....

The case involved a writ petition filed by Smt. Vanajakshi, the Adhyaksha of Javagal Gram Panchayat, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the notice dated 11.03.2019 issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Back Billing Charges Against Educational Institution in Electricity Dispute — Unauthorized Use of Electricity Allegation Fails Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Violations. The court held that the demand was barred by limitation under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the orders were passed without proper notice or hearing....

The petitioners, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (a deemed university under the UGC Act, 1956) and its affiliated institutions, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, G S Venkatesh, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in Special S.C. No.12/2016 for offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Dismisses Writ Petition Against Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order Upholding Lokayukta Enquiry. Court Holds That Challenge to Entrustment of Departmental Enquiry is Premature and Petitioner Can Raise All Contentions After Enquiry Concludes....

The dispute arose from an illegal construction on a civic amenity site under the Mullamari Irrigation Project. In 2007, Smt. Mahananda, an allottee, built a house on a site reserved for a park instead...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence....

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the order dated 20.12.2017 passed by the Sen...