Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence — Dog on Road Caused Rider to Fall, Not Vehicle Impact. Claimant's Son Died After Losing Control of Motorcycle While Avoiding a Dog; Insurance Company's Appeal Partly Allowed Reducing Liability by 50%....

The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 28.02.2018 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Pillion Rider in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Established. Claimant awarded additional compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries sustained in a road accident....

The appeal was filed by the claimant, Smt. Sumithramma, under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 17.02.2016 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC....

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgments and orders in O.S.No.169/2000 and R.A.No.273/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Hospital and Proprietor Against ARCIL in SARFAESI Act Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Dismissing Writ Petitions as Not Maintainable. The Court held that the remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act is an efficacious alternative remedy and the writ petition was not maintainable....

The appellants, M/S Sridevi Hospital and its proprietor Dr. K. Senthilnathan, filed a writ appeal against a common order dated 20.12.2024 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Bar Council to Consider Advocate's Representation for Reinstatement in Practicing Advocates List. Petitioner's Long-Standing Practice and Lack of Response from Bar Council Emphasized....

The petitioner, M A Hameed, an advocate enrolled with the Karnataka State Bar Council (KSBC) under enrollment No. KAR/387/1989, had practiced for over 25 years. He filed a writ petition under Articles...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court's Partial Decree for Declaration, Injunction, and Partition. Appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and trial court's findings were based on proper appreciation of evidence under Section 96 CPC....

The case involves two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2021 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ron...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises for consideration when both courts below have concurrently found the plaintiff's possession and title based on evidence....

The present regular second appeal was filed by the defendants (appellants) under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 14.08.2013 passed by the Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title, Defendant's Adverse Possession Not Established. Court sets aside concurrent findings, holding that burden of proof on plaintiff to prove title was not discharged, and defendant's claim of adverse possession was not proved....

The appellant, Yallappa, was the defendant in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondent, Tangamma, in O.S. No. 19/2012 before the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Shahapur. The plaintif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds trial and appellate court decrees dismissing suit for declaration and injunction, finding no substantial question of law....

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property....

The case involves two regular second appeals filed by the appellants, Chanderakant and Suryakant, against the respondents, who are legal representatives of the original defendant. The appellants were ...