Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Partition Decree. Trial Court Decreed Suit for Partition and Separate Possession, Determining Shares Among Legal Heirs of Gregory and Alphonsus Coelho....

The appeal arose from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Ruth Lobo (plaintiff/first respondent) against the legal heirs of Gregory Coelho and Alphonsus Coelho, the two sons of Sebas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Conscious Possession. Directors of a transport company cannot be held vicariously liable for illegal transportation of poppy straw by driver without proof of knowledge or connivance under NDPS Act....

The petitioners, Sunil Kumar Koushik and Vijay Kochhar, were accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 12/2021-22 registered at Indi Excise Police Station for offences under Sections 15(c), 18(c), 25, 61, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused No.2 in Organized Crime Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 3 of Karnataka Control of Organized Crime Act, 2000. Court held that prior approval of the competent authority under Section 3(1) of the KCOCA is mandatory and its absence renders the FIR and entire proceedings void ab initio....

The petitioner, Sri Mirle Varadaraju, accused no.2 in Crime No.2/2019 registered at Rajarajeshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for an offence punishable under Section 3 of the Karnataka Control o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Kiran Sebastiyan @ Kiran, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumakuru, in S.C. No. 16/2016 for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Prior Approval Under KCOCA for Lack of Prosecution. Petitioner failed to appear despite notice, leading to dismissal of petition seeking quashing of order under Section 24(1)(a) of Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000....

The petitioner, Abdul Rasheed @ Puttu Bayer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petition sought to quash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Against Preventive Detention Order under Karnataka Goonda Act. Detenu Alleges Non-Consideration of Representation and Arbitrary Use of Power by Police Inspector....

The writ petition is a habeas corpus proceeding filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the detenu and his wife against the Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru, the State of Karnataka, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale....

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family members. They were aggrieved by the order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence. The appeal challenges the trial court's reliance on circumstantial evidence and FSL report in convicting the accused under Sections 302 and 201 IPC....

Background: A criminal appeal was filed by the appellant against his conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant was the husband of th...