Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Commercial Court Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admissions Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC — Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration. The court held that Order XII Rule 6 CPC permits judgment on admissions without waiting for evidence, and the Commercial Court's failure to exercise jurisdiction warranted remand....

The appellant, Iqbal Dalla, filed a counter claim in a commercial suit filed by respondent Life Insurance Corporation of India Limited seeking recovery of Rs.49,24,532/-. The appellant claimed that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet....

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. No criminal offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable....

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Parga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Attempt Limit for PwBD Candidates in Civil Services Examination. Classification Between SC/ST and OBC/General PwBD Candidates Held Reasonable Under Article 14....

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, a person with 57% multiple disability (locomotor and low vision), challenged Rule 3 of the Civil Services Examination Rules 2024, which restricts the number of attemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Challenge to District Magistrate's Order Appointing Tehsildar for Possession in Cooperative Society Recovery. The Court held that the District Magistrate's power under Rule 107(11)(d-1)(vi) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 is ministerial and does not require a hearing to the borrower....

The petitioners, Amit Prakash Jori and Jyoti Prakash Jori, were borrowers who had taken a loan of Rs.30 lakh from respondent No.2, Dyandeep Co-op. Credit Society Limited, on 5th October 2016. Upon def...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act....

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 December 2024. The Industrial Court allowed the wo...