Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In

Karnataka High Court

Home Karnataka High Court
Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer and Joint Trial of Case and Counter Case to Avoid Conflicting Judgments. Court Directs Committal of Magistrate's Case to Special Court Under Section 407 Cr.P.C. for Joint Trial with Counter Case Involving SC/ST Act Offences to Prevent Inconsistent Verdicts....

The petitioner, Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Hiremath, was the first informant in Crime No.200/2017 registered at Jayanagar Police Station against respondent Dr. Raghavendra for offences under Sections 341, 324,...

By Admin
  • 113
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MUDA Allotment of Civic Amenities Site. Allotment to Second Respondent Upheld as Decision-Making Process Found Free from Illegality, Irrationality, or Procedural Impropriety....

The dispute arose from the allotment of a civic amenity site by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Pursuant to a public notification dated January 9, 2018, MUDA invited applications from r...

By Admin
  • 37
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Magistrate to Take Cognizance Against Banks in Criminal Complaint — Failure to Summon Body Corporates Despite Prima Facie Case Constitutes Error. Magistrate's Omission to Summon State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank as Accused Under Sections 120B, 403, 408, 409, 447, 381, 420 IPC Read With Section 37 IPC Is Corrected by High Court Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution....

The petitioner, Sri B. Prashanth Hegde, filed a complaint against officers of State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank for offences under Sections 120B, 403, 408, 409, 447, 381, 420 read with Sect...

By Admin
  • 138
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case as Complaint Was Time-Barred Under Section 142(b) of NI Act. Failure to File Condonation Application for Limitation Despite Objection at Trial Renders Acquittal Proper....

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose out of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging dishonour of three cheques. The complainant, a financier, claime...

By Admin
  • 58
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Circulars Mandating Public Examinations for 5th and 8th Standard Students. Petitioners Contend Circulars Violate Sections 16, 30, 38(4) of Right to Education Act, 2009 and Section 145 of Karnataka Education Act, 1983....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of four writ petitions filed by associations of unaided private schools and a parent of a fifth standard student, challenging certain circulars i...

By Admin
  • 82
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Whether Industrial Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 33(2)(b) Industrial Disputes Act While Rejecting Approval for Dismissal. Tribunal's Findings on Victimisation and Disproportionate Punishment Without Pleadings and Beyond Limited Prima Facie Review Challenged....

The writ petition arose from an industrial dispute where the management of Bata India Limited challenged the order of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore, dated 12.04.2011, which rejected the managemen...

By Admin
  • 96
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Child Custody in International Parental Abduction Case. Father's Petition for Repatriation of Minor Son from India to Germany Dismissed as Habeas Corpus Not Maintainable for Custody Disputes....

The petitioner, Mr. Sankar Viswanathan, a German resident, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking production and repatriation o...

By Admin
  • 211
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 28(4) of KIADB Act — Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Consider Objections Renders Final Notification Invalid. The court held that the requirement of a personal hearing under Section 28(4) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 is mandatory and its violation vitiates the acquisition....

The petitioner, Sri B.C. Lokesh, challenged the acquisition of his 2-acre land in Sy.No.176 of Bagaluru Village, Yelahanka Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District, by the State of Karnataka under the Karnatak...

By Admin
  • 222
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Officer’s Endorsements Denying Compensation for Phot Kharab Lands, Directs Enquiry Under Rule 21(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. The Court held that classification as phot kharab does not automatically vest ownership in the State; the Land Acquisition Officer must ascertain whether the land falls under Rule 21(2)(a) or (b) before deciding compensation....

Background: The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Upper Krishna Project, challenging the endorsements of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SL...

By Admin
  • 107
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Intent. Conviction under Sections 324, 326, 504 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Corroborate Ocular Testimony and Motive Was Not Established....

The petitioner, Kalyani @ Kallappa Jakapure, was convicted by the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Aland in C.C. No. 581/2009 for offences punishable under Sections 324, 326 and 504 of the Indian Pena...

By Admin
  • 89
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition natural justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt judgment
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Karnataka High Court Examines Revision Against Concurrent Conviction in Cheque Dishonour C...

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitioners in Food Safety and Standards Act Case Seeking Qu...

Supreme Court Allows Assessee in GST Limitation Case by Setting Aside Show Cause Notice fo...

Supreme Court Upholds Election Petitioner in Representation of People Act, 1951 Matter on ...

Supreme Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband Based on Prior Settlem...

Supreme Court Upholds Appeal in Stamp Duty Classification Dispute; Industrial Use Prevails...

Supreme Court Upholds Directions for Expedited Construction of Limited Use Subway at Level...

Lost Your Password?