All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Arbitration Award Not Binding on Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that an arbitration award does not operate as res judicata against a party who was not a party to the arbitration and who purchased the property in a court auction....

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits in respect of a three-storey commercial-cum-residential building situated at Sarafa Bazar, Lashkar, Gwalior. The suit property...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Probate Revocation Case — Limitation Period for Revocation Runs from Date of Knowledge, Not Grant of Probate. Application under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 filed 27 years after probate held within limitation as respondents had no knowledge of probate until 2019....

The case involves a dispute over the revocation of probate granted in 1995. Smt. Gouriprova Sen inherited properties from her husband and executed a Will on 9 July 1989, appointing her nephew, Dhiraj ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards....

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which had upheld the dismissal of MPRDC'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations....

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings of fraudulent and manipulative trading in the shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows PIL Seeking Prevention of Cow Slaughter in Non-Designated Places During Bakrid. Court Holds That Slaughter of Cows and Calves Must Only Occur in Designated Slaughterhouses Under Article 48 of the Constitution and Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act....

The petitioner, K. Surya alias K. Surya Prasanth, a resident of Coimbatore and an activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Batch of Petitions on Promotion Seniority of Police Subordinates Under Tamil Nadu Special Rules. Rule 3(b)(ii)(b) of Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Scrutinized for Constitutional Validity....

This batch of cases came before the High Court of Judicature at Madras comprising a Division Bench of Justice R. Suresh Kumar and Justice N. Senthilkumar. The batch included multiple writ petitions an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes the process of cutting, grooving, and routin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panels to affix them on building façades as per ...