Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Executive Magistrate's Injunction Order in Section 145 Cr.P.C. Proceedings Due to Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Lacks Jurisdiction to Pass Orders Under Section 145 Cr.P.C. When Possession is Already Subject Matter of a Civil Suit....

The petitioners, Ramdas Ramchandra Patil and Sakharam Ramchandra Patil, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Executive Magis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Original Defendant in Hindu Succession Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Held Child Born from Void Marriage Is Legitimate Under Section 16(3) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Has Right to Partition of Father's Self-Acquired Property....

The matter arose from a suit filed by respondent No.1, the original plaintiff, seeking partition, possession, and declaration that a sale deed dated 29 June 2010 executed in favour of respondent No.3 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Dispute over ancestral property and limitation period under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 — Held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the appellant's possession was not adverse....

The present second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the appellants, Mahadeo Sitaram Navale and Chaturabai Mahadeo Navale, against the respondents, who are the h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Petition — No Patent Illegality Found in Award of Damages for Breach of Contract. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses and quantification of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The present Commercial Arbitration Petition was filed by the Petitioner (original respondent in arbitration) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Award of Rs.27.60 Lakhs Quashed as Arbitral Tribunal Failed to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses and Relied on Unproven Documents....

The petitioner, Archana Bhagwan Jaswani, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated October 15, 2016, passed by a learned arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Relatives of Husband in Dowry Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Generalised Complaints Against In-Laws and Relatives Without Specific Instances of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Are Liable to Be Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC....

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the original accused (applicants 1 to 6) seeking quashing of FIR No. 0075 of 2023 registered with Cidco P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Challenge to Trial Court's Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. The dispute centered on compliance with the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, after the trial court refused to permit post-trial amendment to add a legal heir and seek declaration that a will and sale deed were null and void....

The litigation arose from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff in 2011 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, seeking partition and separate possession of a double-storied residen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Consideration of Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Not Affecting Public Order. The court held that failure to consider bail conditions and lack of public order disturbance in in-camera statements renders the detention order invalid under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act....

The petitioner, Paras Rajendra Apte, challenged his detention order dated 09.04.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Yavatmal under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activitie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established....

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangero...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NIT Communication in Gunthewari Regularization Case — Reservation Lifted by Prior Government Resolution. Petitioner Society's plots held not reserved for Higher Education as reservation was lifted under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 read with Gunthewari Act, 2001....

The petitioner, Gousiya Labour Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., developed a residential layout on Survey Nos. 52 and 54, Mouza-Bidipeth, Nagpur, and retained Plot Nos. 19A to 19D admeasuring 11,500 ...