Karnataka High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance....

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable property under the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act. Appeal Filed Under Section 378 Cr.P.C. Alleges Erroneous Acquittal for Offences Under Sections 366, 376 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act....

The State filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the acquittal of the accused by the trial court for offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Ejectment Suit — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Title and Possession Against Financial Corporations. Suit for ejectment and damages dismissed as plaintiffs failed to establish title and possession over suit property, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963....

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 11.04.2007 passed by the XVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in O.S.No.3071/1999, dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiffs (a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Sufficient Cause for Recalling Witness Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC...

The petitioner, Channabasappa S/o Shivappa Hosamani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18.09.2023 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Narag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim for Damages to Car. Owner of Vehicle is Competent to Maintain Claim Petition Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Even if Not the Registered Owner....

The appellant, Sri Hemanth Raju, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Son in Parricide Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Patreppa S/o. Sangappa Uppin, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his father, Sangappa Baseteppa Uppin, and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution alleged tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Loan of Rs.2,50,000 for Education and Family Necessities Supported by Evidence; Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused....

The complainant, Smt H B Bhagyalakshmi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 26.10.2018 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Green Belt Classification of Jayamahal Palace Hotel in Revised Master Plan 2015. The court held that the BDA's notification classifying the property as green belt was valid and not ultra vires, as the petitioners failed to establish any vested right or arbitrariness in the zoning decision....

The petitioners, legal representatives of the late H.H. Jyotendra Sinhji Vikramsinhji, owned properties bearing numbers 1, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, presently known as 'Jayamahal Palace ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Property Owners in BBMP Encroachment Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Show-Cause Notice Did Not Specify Time for Compliance, Rendering the Proceeding Unfair Under Section 321 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976....

The petitioners, Vasundhara A.G.K., N.H. Muralidhar, and Amba Prasad N.H., filed separate writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the demolition order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Disqualification of MLAs for Alleged Defection Under Tenth Schedule — No Prima Facie Case of Disqualification Made Out as Petitioners Failed to Provide Specific Evidence of Voluntary Giving Up Membership or Voting Contrary to Party Whip....

The petitioner, Bhimappa Gundappa Gadad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking disqualification of several Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) of Karnatak...