Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Claims Without Evidence. Claimant Failed to Prove Underutilization of Resources and Extra Overheads, Rendering Award Perverse Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The appellant, M/s Kamal Constructions, was the original claimant in an arbitration against the Union of India and another respondent. The Arbitrator had awarded certain claims, including Claim No.3 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Closure of Textile Mills Under Section 250 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Reinstatement of Retrenched Workers Denied Due to Financial Non-Viability. Closure Application Approved by Appropriate Government and Industrial Tribunal; Retrenchment Compensation Paid; No Justification for Reopening or Reinstatement....

The petitioner, M/s. Standard Mills (Textile Division of Standard Industries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had been in the textile industry for over 100 years, operating...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Maintenance to Wife Despite Customary Divorce. Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Regardless of Customary Divorce....

The petitioner, Ashok Deochand Mali, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the judgment and order dated 27.08.2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Cheating Case Against Vehicle Dealership Proprietor and Employees. Revisional Court's Order Set Aside as Trial Court's Refusal to Issue Process Was Not Perverse....

The petitioners, including the proprietor and employees of a vehicle dealership, challenged the revisional court's order directing issuance of process against them under Section 420 read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Jail Appeal by Accused in Rape Case. Conviction Under IPC Sections 376, 201, 506 Challenged Based on Discrepancies in Prosecutrix’s Testimony and Lack of Scientific Evidence....

The present matter is a criminal appeal filed by the accused against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule on 26th December 2014 in Sessions Case No.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction of Medical Officer Under Sections 7 and 13(2) Challenged on Grounds of Invalid Sanction and Lack of Proof of Demand; Court Examines Evidence of Trap and Complainant's Testimony....

The appeal arose from the conviction of a Medical Officer at Cottage Hospital, Chopda, under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The complainant, an illiterate Adivasi labo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Five Accused for Arson and Criminal Intimidation Under Sections 143, 506, 436 IPC Despite Enmity Defence. Accused Chased Complainant and Set Thatched Hut Ablaze After Prior Afternoon Quarrel, Causing Complete Loss of Dwelling and Household Articles....

The matter pertained to an appeal filed by five convicted accused challenging the judgment of the First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, dated 13 December 2002 in Sessions Case No. 141 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Execution Orders in Arbitration Award Enforcement — Upholds Attachment of Property and Rejection of Objections Under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC....

The petitioners, M/s. Trimurti Exports and its partners, were judgment debtors in an execution proceeding arising from an arbitral award. The award, dated 18.04.2013 with an addendum on 19.05.2013, di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits....

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Court seeking to recall an order dated 12th June 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940 — Upholds Award Allowing Claims and Rejecting Counterclaims. Arbitrator's Findings on Agency Agreement and Limitation Upheld as Not Perverse or Contrary to Law....

The petitioners, Metal Tube And Rolling Mills and others, filed a petition under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 challenging an arbitral award dated 14th June, 2011. The dispute arose from an ...