Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder by Husband Who Set Wife on Fire. Court Considers Reliability of Multiple Dying Declarations in Light of Severe Burn Injuries and Allegations of Tutoring....

The appeal arose from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir in Sessions Case No.16 of 2012, whereby the appellant-husband was convicted under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeal Against Acquittal Under Sections 302 and 498A IPC — Trial Court Found Dying Declarations Unreliable...

The State of Maharashtra preferred an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent (accused) under sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule. The decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for Smothering and Staging Fire. High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Trial Verdict....

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 6th January, 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in Sessions Trial No.59 of 1999. The trial court convicted accused No.1 Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Harassment Soon Before Death. Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty or Demand for Dowry Under Section 304-B IPC....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Syed Rahim, Syed Janimiya, and Bannabai (since deceased) for offences under Sections 302, 201, 511 read with 34 IPC and Section 304-B IPC. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Homicidal Death and Compounding of Offence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Murder, and Section 498-A Conviction Quashed on Compromise....

The case involves two appeals filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No.116/2000. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.118/2001 are Gangadhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Over Collector’s Authority to Impose Conditions on Transmission Line Project Under Indian Telegraph Act...

The dispute arose from the construction of a 400 KV DC transmission line between Aurangabad and Boisar by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., a Government of India enterprise notified as Central Tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Development Corporation in Turnkey Plantation Income Tax Case — Income from Turnkey Plantation Contract Held Not Agricultural Income Under Section 2(1A) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the splitting of income into two stages and affirmed that the dominant purpose was service, not agriculture....

The appellant, The Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited, a government-owned company, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced for Irrigated Land with Well and Trees. Market Value Determined at Rs. 50,000 per Acre Based on Potential and Comparable Sales Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The appellant, Vinaykumar Maniram Chavan, owned land bearing Survey No. 88/1B admeasuring 2 H 02 R in Dapori, District Akola. The land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the construction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 129(2) of MRTP Act in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Court holds that interest under Section 129(2) is payable only from the date of possession if compensation is paid within three years, otherwise from the date of award....

The petitioners' land was acquired under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) by the Municipal Council, Pusad. Possession was taken on various dates in 1994 and 1996, but co...