Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and POCSO Act. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR....

The appellant, Ranjit Ghutke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the rape of a 13-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Failure to Record Information and Forward Report to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal....

The appellant, Dnyandeo s/o Atmaram Aswar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial No. 8/2002 for an offence punishable under Section 20(a)(b)(i) of the Narc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Contest in Eviction Petition Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Competent Authority Cannot Adjudicate Merits at Leave Stage. The court set aside orders declining leave to contest, holding that the authority must only assess whether a prima facie defence exists, not decide its merits....

The petitioner, Mr. Vijay S. Machindar, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 7th June 2016 and 9th August 2017 passed by the competent authority under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Life Convict's Petition Seeking Premature Release After 14 Years. Court Holds That Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines As Category 3(d) Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Is Proper and Not Arbitrary....

The case involved a life convict seeking premature release after having served 14 years of actual imprisonment. The petitioner was convicted for offences under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Under Section 3(2) Challenged for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Credible Material....

The petitioner, Manoj @ Sonya S/o Ramdas Ghule, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226 of the Constitution of India and the provisions of the Maharashtra Prevention of Da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.473 OF 2001...

The present appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 27.07.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in Sessions Case No.123/1997, acquitting the five accused (respondents) of offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 354 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Outraging Modesty Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Umesh Dharamdas Landge, was convicted by the 6th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.558 of 2001 for an offence under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 186...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Railway Property Theft Case, Upholding Acquittal. Confessional Statement Recorded by Police Officer Held Inadmissible Under Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872....

The Union of India, through the Railway Protection Force, Akola, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 17-08-2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways), Bhusawal, in ...