Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Order in Passage Obstruction Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses and Adduce Evidence Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906....

The petitioner, Sudhir Yashwant Dhangade, challenged the orders dated 16/06/2017 and 02/01/2018 passed by the learned Tehsildar (Mamlatdar), Chiplun and the learned Additional Collector, Ratnagiri res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance of Contract for Sale — Agreement of Sale Validly Proved and Plaintiff Ready and Willing to Perform. Court upholds trial court's finding that defendant failed to prove that agreement was not executed or that plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform....

The present appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad in Special Civil Suit No.26/2014, whereby the suit for specific performance of contract for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The judgment concerns five criminal appeals filed by multiple appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of one person. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision and State's Revision Against Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Bribe Demand and Acceptance Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The case involves two criminal revision applications arising from an order of the Special Judge, Bhandara, discharging the accused Kunda Motiramji Bodalkar in Special Criminal Case No. 7/2015 under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintenance of Rs.1500 per Month in Domestic Violence Case. The court held that the wife is entitled to maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the quantum is not excessive....

The case involves a wife, Mrunal Talmale, who filed an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking maintenance from her husband and in-laws. The Judicial Magist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Rebut Presumption. Accused's Failure to Enter Witness Box and Lead Evidence Results in Confirmation of Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881....

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Amol @ Jolly Shrichand Kungwani, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The compl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension Officer's Petition Challenging Disciplinary Penalty — Enquiry Initiated Under Wrong Rules and Charge Sheet by Appellate Authority. The Court held that initiation of proceedings under inapplicable rules and issuance of charge sheet by appellate authority vitiated the enquiry and penalty....

The petitioner, Manojkumar Nemaji Shahare, was appointed as Gram Sevak in 1992 and promoted to Extension Officer, Panchayat in 2007. He was employed with the Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. A disciplinary enq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement Not Binding on Minor Coparceners. Karta's alienation of joint family property without legal necessity or benefit is not binding on minors; readiness and willingness cannot be considered for first time in appeal without issue framed....

The appellants, original defendants 1 to 5, are members of a joint Hindu family. Respondent 1, Kiran Avachat, filed Special Civil Suit 78/2006 for specific performance of an agreement dated 30.06.2005...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Respondents in Writ Petition for Filing False Affidavits. Court holds that filing false affidavits amounts to contempt and perjury, and the court can initiate proceedings under Section 340 CrPC without hearing the accused at the preliminary stage....

The judgment pertains to a Civil Application filed under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by the applicant, Satyanarayan Nandkishor Pande, who was Respo...