All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows PIL Seeking Prevention of Cow Slaughter in Non-Designated Places During Bakrid. Court Holds That Slaughter of Cows and Calves Must Only Occur in Designated Slaughterhouses Under Article 48 of the Constitution and Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act....

The petitioner, K. Surya alias K. Surya Prasanth, a resident of Coimbatore and an activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Batch of Petitions on Promotion Seniority of Police Subordinates Under Tamil Nadu Special Rules. Rule 3(b)(ii)(b) of Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Scrutinized for Constitutional Validity....

This batch of cases came before the High Court of Judicature at Madras comprising a Division Bench of Justice R. Suresh Kumar and Justice N. Senthilkumar. The batch included multiple writ petitions an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes the process of cutting, grooving, and routin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panels to affix them on building façades as per ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Relatives in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Omnibus Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and DV Act complaint quashed for lack of specific overt acts against appellants....

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by Appellants, quashing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord between (complainant) and her husband Divyaraj Dhakad. The appellants were relatives of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disconnection Notices for Brick Kilns Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Furnish Inspection Report and Prior Proceedings Before Issuing Show Cause Notices Renders Them Unsustainable Under Article 226 of Constitution of India....

The petitioners, P.Periyakaruppaiya and S.S.Shenbaga Vinayagam, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, challenging n...