Bombay High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Assistant Professor with Permanent Disability in Motor Accident. Loss of Earning Capacity and Future Prospects Considered Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellant, Deepali, an assistant professor aged 33, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aurangabad, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a motor accident on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Son Driving Father's Car Without Valid Licence Not a Third Party Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimant Mother Not Entitled to Compensation as Deceased Was Owner's Son and Not a Third Party, and Driving Without Licence Breached Policy Conditions....

The present appeal was filed by the insurance company, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the judgment and award dated 31.03.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Section 14(1)(h) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Failure to Prove Demand and Default Within Three Months Renders Disqualification Invalid....

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Kisan Dhage, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Wara Jahangir, in 2015. Respondent No.4, Suresh Ashruji Gawande, also a member, filed a complaint alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes Cross Appeals from Trial Court's Injunction Order in Suit for Demolition and CRZ Declaration; Construction in CRZ Not Entitled to Completion Certificate Though Demolition Restrained When Built Per Sanctioned Plan....

The dispute arose from a notice dated 7th February 1998 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for demolition of Buildin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in NI Act Case Due to Complainant's Absence — Section 256 CrPC Mandates Acquittal When Complainant Fails to Appear Without Justification. The court held that the Magistrate's discretion to adjourn was not exercised as the complainant and his advocate were absent without any application for adjournment....

The appellant, Vamsi Labs Private Limited, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC against an order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, on 26 May 1997. The Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Weak Motive. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 120-B, 34 IPC....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Dnyaneshwar Yeshwant Mutalik (Respondent No.1) and three others in Sessions Case No.202 of 1995 for offences under Sections 120-B, 302 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Credible Evidence. Dispute Over Grain Cellar Leads to Fatal Assault, but Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur dated 30 July 1997, acquitting the respondents (Gajendra Vasudeo Patil, Vishnu Vasudeo Patil, Keshav Va...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition in Part and Directs Landlord to Provide Permanent Alternate Accommodation Despite Completion of Construction. Non-compliance with IOD Condition No.10 and Court Order Renders Commencement Certificate Irregular, Entitling Tenant to Specific Performance of Obligation....

The petitioner, a tenant of a room in Gayatri Bhuvan building at Malad, Mumbai, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 alleging collusive and illegal conduct by the landlord/developer and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Challenge to Sections 17(2) and 32(1) Proviso of MMRDA Act by Consent. Land Acquisition by MMRDA Under Challenge: Petitioners Allege Unconstitutional Provisions in MMRDA Act, 1974....

The Bombay High Court heard and disposed of a group of matters comprising Writ Petition No. 841 of 2012, Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011, and Writ Petition No. 1063 of 2013, which involved co...