All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Order in Favour of Assessee for Violation of Natural Justice. Reassessment Order Passed Before Expiry of Reply Deadline and Without Considering Timely Response Violates Fair Hearing Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961....

The dispute arose from an income tax reassessment proceeding initiated against the petitioner, Sai Kiran Clearing Co. Pvt. Ltd., by the Income Tax Department. The petitioner challenged the reassessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Elementary Assistant Teachers in Non-Disclosure of Criminal Antecedents Case. Non-Disclosure of Non-Cognizable Offences Not Fatal to Employment, Directs Reinstatement with Back Wages Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....

The writ petition was filed by three individuals employed as Elementary Assistant Teachers challenging their termination orders dated 14/10/2024 and 11/10/2024 issued by the Education Officer (Primary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Commercial Arbitration Appeal on Arbitrator Ineligibility Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Consent to Appointment of Managing Director as Sole Arbitrator Raises Question of Waiver and Patent Illegality....

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 October 2013 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, a private limited company engaged in water distribution and infrastructure, for water...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes Special Leave Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Based on Consensual Settlement Terms. Court Accepted Fair Settlement Including Payment of 20% Deposited Amount and Rs.9.50 Lakhs in Installments, Clarifying No Impact on Pending Arbitration Proceedings Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881....

The Supreme Court disposed of a Special Leave Petition filed by the complainant challenging the High Court of Karnataka's judgment that had set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Erroneous Sentencing Orders and Excessive Incarceration. Court Sets Aside Life Imprisonment, Restores Original Seven-Year Sentence Under Article 142 of Constitution, and Orders Immediate Release as Appellant Served Over Eleven Years....

The dispute involved an appellant who had been convicted and sentenced in a Special (POCSO) case. Initially, the Special Court imposed a sentence of seven years' imprisonment. However, subsequent orde...