High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Customary Easement Case. Concurrent findings of fact regarding customary easement right to draw water through field bothie upheld under Section 100 CPC....

The plaintiff, Santhakumari, filed a suit seeking a declaration of customary easementary right to draw water for her land through a field bothie (Kanni) situated in Survey No. 829/1A, measuring 30 fee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Title and Possession. Family Arrangement and Adverse Possession Claims Fail as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Necessary Parties Were Not Impleaded....

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the defendant Selvaraj against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which decreed the suit for permanent injunction in favor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Case Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Claimants' Cross Objection for Enhancement Dismissed as Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Multiplier Was Correct....

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.05.2021 when the deceased, Hari Prasad, was riding a motorcycle and was hit from behind by a lorry owned by the 6th respondent and insured by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses FCI's Appeal in Customs Duty Refund Case — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 128 Cannot Be Condoned. Import of Section 129A to condone delay in first appeal under Section 128 is impermissible as Customs Act is a complete code....

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 104 of CPC, challenging an order of the Customs, Excise and Servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Alleged Dangerous Person for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as the two criminal cases relied upon did not affect public order and were already subject to bail....

The petitioner, Siddhant @ Siddharth Sachin Dhanedar, challenged a detention order dated 19/06/2024 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik City, under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956....

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the respondent co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Police Interference in Gold Loan Business Arbitrary and Violative of Fundamental Rights. Writ of Mandamus Issued Restraining Police from Seizing Pledged Gold Articles, Allowing Only Examination by Summoning....

The petitioner, Muthoot Finance Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of gold loans, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Impleading Orders in Land Acquisition References — Reference Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Allowing Impleading Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Without Adjudicating Title. The Court Held That the Land Acquisition Act is a Complete Code and Third Parties Must Establish Title Before a Civil Court....

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, presided over by Justice, delivered a common judgment on 20 December 2024 in three connected writ petitions filed by the petitioners challenging orders of th...