High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition by Union of India and Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension Under Regulation 37. Disability Caused by Lifestyle Diseases and Service in Peace Station Not Attributable to Military Service, as Per Release Medical Board's Recorded Reasons....

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Union of India and others challenging the order dated 03.03.2022 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chennai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Considers Writ Petition by Union of India Challenging Armed Forces Tribunal Order Allowing Disability Pension to Retired Army Officer. Union of India Argues Officer Retired on Superannuation Does Not Satisfy Criteria Under Regulation 37 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 for Disability Element....

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Armed Forces...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Territorial Army Havildar's Pension Claim After 29-Year Delay, Upholding Armed Forces Tribunal Order. Court Rules That Only Embodied Service Qualifies Under Regulation 132 of Army Pension Regulations, 1961 and Unembodied Service Cannot Be Reckoned; Reservist Category Inapplicable....

The case pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court by a former Havildar of the Territorial Army, challenging an order of the Armed F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition by Lecturers Seeking Salary Arrears and Career Advancement Benefits Under Article 226. Alleged Attendance Register Dispute Leads to Memos Against Petitioners; Direction Sought Against College for Violating Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulations) Act, 1976....

A writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by three lecturers employed at Meenakshi College for Women, a government-aided autonomous college. The petitioners sought a man...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Liability Upheld. Claimant's injuries and treatment evidence sufficient to affirm MACT award under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27.11.2015 at 11:30 p.m. when a Bolero Jeep bearing registration No.KA-38-M-2752, driven by its driver in a high speed and negligent manner, lost...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Revenue Authority's Refusal to Record Civil Court Injunction in Land Records — Failure to Uphold Judicial Order Violates Rule of Law. Revenue authorities must record subsisting civil court injunctions in revenue records under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964....

The petitioner, Suvarana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, assailing an endorsement dated 31.12.2024 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet....

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. No criminal offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable....

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Parga...