High Court

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt ...
High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bomba...

Home High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act Due to Proper Procedure and Pending Statutory Appeal. Eviction Notice for Police Protection to Remove Encroachers Upheld as Non-Arbitrary and Following Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971....

In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner, an unauthorised occupant, challenged a letter dated 08.05.2024 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, St. Th...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging De-Occupation Notice Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, Upholding Authority's Power to Act Against Unauthorized Construction. The Court Held That Writs Against Notices Are Not Routinely Entertainable, Limiting Relief to Cases of Jurisdictional Error or Mala Fides, and Directed Petitioner to Submit Explanation Within One Week....

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the owner of a building at Door No.383, Mint Street, Chennai, challenging a de-occupation notice dated 17.11...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Coercive Action for Unauthorised Construction. Petitioners Directed to Submit Explanation and Authorities to Decide on Merits Within Four Weeks....

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by two petitioners against the Commissioner of Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, its Zonal Officer, and the Member Secreta...

High Court

High Court of Madras Decrees Ex Parte Copyright Infringement Suit for Exclusive Internet Webcasting Rights — Infringement Established as Defendant Failed to Contest Despite Service of Summons and Plaintiff Proved Assignment of Rights. Plaintiff's Rights Under Assignment Deed Dated 27.01.2020 for 21 Films Were Infringed by Second Defendant's Unauthorized Telecast, Entitling Plaintiff to Declaration, Injunction, and Damages Under Sections 55 and 62 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957....

The suit pertained to copyright infringement of exclusive internet webcasting rights over 21 Tamil films. The plaintiff, a proprietor of a cinema business, claimed to have acquired these rights from a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Revenue Authority's Entry of Civil Court Injunction in Record of Rights. Tahsildar Not Empowered to Record Court Orders Without Specific Direction from Civil Court....

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, challenging an endorsement dated 03.02.2024 i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Reverses Trial Court's Finding of Res Judicata. The court held that the earlier suit was not between the same parties and the subject matter was different, thus the bar of res judicata under Section 11 CPC did not apply....

The appellant, Ashok Patil, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 15.02.2017 passed by the Additiona...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Journalists' Plea Against Alleged Harassment by Special Investigation Team in Cyber Crime Case. The Court directed that reporters cannot be summoned frequently without specific reason and their electronic devices cannot be seized without following due process under BNSS, emphasizing the right to privacy and protection of journalistic sources as laid down in Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India....

The case arose from writ petitions filed by various reporters of news channels and a criminal original petition seeking directions to restrain the Special Investigation Team (SIT) from harassing them ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition by Union of India and Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension Under Regulation 37. Disability Caused by Lifestyle Diseases and Service in Peace Station Not Attributable to Military Service, as Per Release Medical Board's Recorded Reasons....

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Union of India and others challenging the order dated 03.03.2022 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chennai...

High Court

High Court of Madras Considers Writ Petition by Union of India Challenging Armed Forces Tribunal Order Allowing Disability Pension to Retired Army Officer. Union of India Argues Officer Retired on Superannuation Does Not Satisfy Criteria Under Regulation 37 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 for Disability Element....

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Armed Forces...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Territorial Army Havildar's Pension Claim After 29-Year Delay, Upholding Armed Forces Tribunal Order. Court Rules That Only Embodied Service Qualifies Under Regulation 132 of Army Pension Regulations, 1961 and Unembodied Service Cannot Be Reckoned; Reservist Category Inapplicable....

The case pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court by a former Havildar of the Territorial Army, challenging an order of the Armed F...

Previous Next

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

High Court

Sort by:

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Coercive Action for Unauthorised Construction. Petitioners Directed to Submit Explanation and Authorities to Decide on Merits Within Four Weeks....

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Revenue Authority's Entry of Civil Court Injunction in Record of Rights. Tahsildar Not Empowered to Record Court Orders Without Specific Direction from Civil Court....

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit, Reverses Trial Court's Finding of Res Judicata. The court held that the earlier suit was not between the same parties and the subject matter was different, thus the bar of res judicata under Section 11 CPC did not apply....

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Allows Assessee in GST Limitation Case by Setting Aside Show Cause Notice fo...

Supreme Court Allows Criminal Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Harassment Death Case, Res...

Supreme Court Restores Criminal Appeal Against Acquittal After High Court Dismissed It as ...

Supreme Court Upholds Election Petitioner in Representation of People Act, 1951 Matter on ...

Supreme Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband Based on Prior Settlem...