High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application, Rejects Plaint in Hindu Succession Partition Suit. Granddaughter Lacks Coparcenary Rights Under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 When Her Mother is Alive and Not Claiming Partition....

The revision application arose from a suit for declaration, partition, possession, perpetual injunction, and mesne profit filed by respondent no.1/plaintiff, a granddaughter of Namdev Nikam, against h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision by Original Defendant in Waqf Suit — Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for Absence of Gazette Notification. Plaint Claiming Declaration That Suit Land Was Waqf Property Failed as No Official Gazette Included Survey Nos. 51 and 52 Under Waqf Act, 1995; Mere Letter/Corrigendum Not Sufficient....

The dispute arose from a civil revision application filed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Waqf Tribunal, Aurangabad, which had rejected a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Anil Sitaram Gosavi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khed-Rajgurunagar, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 256 of 2014 for the murder of his wife, punishable under Section 302 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard Public Interest Litigation Challenging Government Resolution Establishing Additional Tahsildar Office in Nilanga Taluka. The core question was whether Section 4(4) MLR Code's previous publication requirement applied to creation of an additional Tahsildar office, or whether Sections 7 and 13 MLR Code governed....

In a public interest litigation before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, the petitioners challenged Government Resolution dated 18 July 2023, which established an additional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification After 32 Years Due to Laches and Delay. Petitioner's claim for quashing final notification under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 fails as the challenge is highly belated and the land has already been developed and allotted to third parties....

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath K., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, seeking to quash a final notification b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Execution of MSME Arbitral Award on Grounds of Fraud. Court Considers Whether Execution Proceedings Can Be Quashed When Award Was Not Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Despite Participation in Arbitration....

The petitioner, Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited, floated a tender for supply of drugs and disposable delivery kits. The respondent, Plasti Surge Industries Pvt. Ltd., emerged as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Order Allowing DNA Test Under Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC in Partition Suit. Petition Raises Questions of Right to Privacy Under Article 21 and Applicability of Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872....

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the third defendant in a partition suit, O.S. No. 89 of 2016, challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Channarayap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree of Permanent Injunction. The Court held that the First Appellate Court's failure to frame points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC vitiated its judgment....

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (plaintiffs) and the respondents (defendants) concerning a suit for permanent injunction. The plaintiffs claimed possession of the suit prop...