High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion from Voters List for Co-operative Society Elections. Petitioner Contends That Delegation Form Submitted Before Administrator Appointment Must Be Given Effect, While Respondents Assert Board's Term Had Expired....

The petitioner, a director of the Kasaba Primary Agriculture Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint After 17 Years for Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment Sought to Introduce New Facts After Commencement of Trial Held Barred Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC....

The petitioners, who are defendants in O.S. No. 8816/2003 pending before the XI Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions on Acceptance of Delegation Forms in Cooperative Society Elections. Petitioners Sought Mandamus to Include Delegate Names in Voters List for DCC Bank Election After Stay of ARCS Order Restoring Board....

The writ petitions were filed by two cooperative societies challenging the non-acceptance of their delegation forms for the election to the Kolar-Chikkaballapura DCC Bank. The societies had their boar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Held That Application Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC Was Not Maintainable as Defendant No.2 Was Already on Record and No Abatement Had Occurred...

The petitioner, Sri Janardhana Suvarna, was Defendant No.2 in O.S.No.233/2016, a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Respondent No.1 (Smt. Rathnavathi L Rao) against the petitioner, Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement to Sell Dated 09.01.2012 Proved, Readiness and Willingness Established, and Limitation Issue Rejected....

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 13.12.2019 passed by the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Written Statement Filing in Civil Suit — Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Held Directory Not Mandatory. The court declined to interfere under Article 227 as the trial court's order was not perverse or illegal....

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit (O.S.No.6032/2017) pending before the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Dispute over ancestral property and limitation period under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 — Held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the appellant's possession was not adverse....

The present second appeal arises from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the appellants, Mahadeo Sitaram Navale and Chaturabai Mahadeo Navale, against the respondents, who are the h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Petition — No Patent Illegality Found in Award of Damages for Breach of Contract. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses and quantification of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The present Commercial Arbitration Petition was filed by the Petitioner (original respondent in arbitration) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Award of Rs.27.60 Lakhs Quashed as Arbitral Tribunal Failed to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses and Relied on Unproven Documents....

The petitioner, Archana Bhagwan Jaswani, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated October 15, 2016, passed by a learned arbi...