High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Registration of Revocation of General Power of Attorney. Registration of a deed of revocation of GPA by the Sub-Registrar without notice to the original holder is illegal and arbitrary, and the court declared it null and void....

The petitioner, North Roof Ventures Private Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the registration of a deed of revocation of a General Power ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compensation Order in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Mere Failure to Prove Case Not Sufficient for Compensation Under Section 250 CrPC. The court held that without a finding of false or vexatious complaint, compensation cannot be imposed under Section 250 CrPC....

The appellant, Prashant Jawarkar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Dr. Ganesh Vasu, alleging dishonour of a cheque. The Judicial Magi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Assistant Professor in College Termination Case Due to Defective Appointment of Inquiry Officer. Appointment by Board of Management Instead of the Recognised Governing Body Under Statute 409(xvi) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Rendered the Entire Ex-Parte Inquiry Void, and Termination Order Was Set Aside....

The petitioner was appointed as a full-time Assistant Professor in Biotechnology at Wilson College, Mumbai, in 2005 and later absorbed into an aided course. Following a show-cause notice in January 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of Amey Cooperative Housing Society in Navi Mumbai — No Violation of FSI or Development Control Regulations Found. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or violation of law, and the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans....

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sandeep Thakur challenging the construction of the Amey Cooperative Housing Society in Nerul, Navi Mumbai. The petitioner al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Custody of Minor Children from Father. Court holds that father's custody of children aged 3 years and 1.5 years is illegal and directs production and custody to mother, considering welfare of minor children as paramount....

The petitioner, Shubhangi w/o Ganesh Yadav, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, seeking a writ of habeas corpus fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Anand S/o Durgappa Gollar, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi in Special Case No.505/2023 for offences under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Externment Under Karnataka Police Act, 1963. Issues of Natural Justice and Mandatory Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 55(b) Considered....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an externment order dated 18.09.2025 passed by the Assistant C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963....

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 15.04.2009 ...