The Court held that: (a) The Special Recovery Officer was duly notified via the gazette notification. (b) The District Magistrate’s function under Rule 107(11)(d-1)(vi) is purely executionary — no...
The Bombay High Court set aside the Industrial Court’s order, holding that mere experience in handling domestic enquiries does not constitute a legally trained mind. Absence of legal qualification o...
No Vested Right for Renewal of License Petition dismissed. Court held Petitioner had no vested legal right for renewal after expiry of license by efflux of time. Licensee’s rights are purely con...
Commercial Summary Suit — Production of Additional Documents Allowed Subject to Costs The Court allowed the production of additional documents, noting that: a) The documents were already referred t...
The High Court upheld the tribunal's direction of 'pay and recover' and ruled that the appellant violated Rule 3(b) by driving without an instructor. The insurance company must satisfy the award and r...
Public Prosecutor’s Role – The Public Prosecutor cannot assume the role of an Investigating Officer or produce evidence beyond what is filed with the charge sheet. The Prosecutor must act imparti...
The Bombay High Court upheld the eviction decree passed by the Trial and Appellate Courts, affirming the landlord's bonafide requirement for the premises under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedu...
The eviction decree passed by the Trial Court and upheld by the Appellate Court was set aside due to: Lack of a valid demand notice as required under Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control A...
The Bombay High Court addressed a dispute over the eviction of tenants on the ground of bonafide requirement, balancing the rights of the landlord's heirs and tenants under Section 16 of the Maharasht...
