High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allowed Second Appeal by Original Defendant No.8 in Partition Suit for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First Appellate Court's Cryptic Concurrence Without Framing Points for Determination or Independently Reappreciating Evidence on Legal Necessity Vitiates Judgment and Warrants Remand....

The case arose from a suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral agricultural land bearing Gut No.1220 at village Ghosarwad. The original plaintiffs, respondent nos.1 and 2, claimed that ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Seeking Removal of Illegal Telecommunication Towers and Creation of Grievance Redressal Committees. Petitioners Contended Violation of Article 21 Health Rights; Respondents Argued DoT Guidelines and Telecommunications Act, 2023 Permit Installation by Intimation Without Development Permission....

By way of a public interest litigation, the petitioners, an association and individuals, approached the Bombay High Court seeking directions against the Pune Municipal Corporation, Pimpri Chinchwad Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Commercial Exploitation of Reclaimed Sea Link Land Under CRZ Notifications. The core legal question was whether a condition in the 1999 environmental clearance prohibiting residential and commercial use of reclaimed land continued to apply after the land ceased to fall within Coastal Regulation Zone under the 2019 Notification....

These two public interest litigations were filed pro-bono-publico to restrain the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation from commercially exploiting land reclaimed for construction of the Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Lookout Circular Against Singapore Citizen Cannot Continue Indefinitely in Cheating Case. Arrest Declared Illegal and Undertakings Accepted as Sufficient Security Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 420 and 34....

The Petitioner, a Singapore citizen, was arraigned as an accused in FIR No. 225 of 2019 under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, based on allegations of fraud made by M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Commercial Appeal Against Interim Injunction Restraining Sale of Pledged Shares. Appeal Filed Under Section 13(1-A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Challenges City Civil Court Order Allowing Temporary Injunction and Directing Rendering of Accounts Relating to Pledged Shares....

The present commercial appeal arose from an interim order passed by the City Civil Court in a suit concerning the pledge of shares. The appellant, original defendant no.4, challenged the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Appeal Challenging Discontinuation of Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright Infringement Suit. The Court Examined Whether Single Judge Correctly Found Suppression of Material Facts Regarding Knowledge of Defendant's Use of ATYATI Device Mark Under Order XXXIX Rule 3 and 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

By way of background, the dispute arose from a commercial IP suit filed by Atyati Technologies Private Limited (original plaintiff) against Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation and Cognizan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Air India Limited After Change in Status. Employees Challenge Dismissal, Stay of Orders, and Pension Scheme Cut-off Date, but Court Questions Whether Employer Remains Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226....

These three writ petitions were filed by employees of Air India Limited (AIL) seeking distinct reliefs against their employer. Writ Petition No.1876 of 2001 was filed by Mr. M. Yogeshwar Raj challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeal in Securities Broker-Client Trading Dispute Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Single Judge's Decision Setting Aside Majority Award and Confirming Dissenting Award Challenged by Investor Client....

Background: The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a dispute between an investor who opened a demat and trading account with a registered stock broker and...