High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971....

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed by the Member, Industrial Court, Mumbai, which dism...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Trust Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Court holds that the Charity Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 by adjudicating title disputes without proper notice and hearing....

The petitioners, who are trustees of a public trust, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Charity Commissioner under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOCA Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Lack of Application of Mind — Proceedings Quashed as Sanction Under Section 23(2) of MCOCA, 1999 Was Granted Without Independent Scrutiny of Material....

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals filed by accused persons challenging the validity of proceedings under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA). The appellants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy....

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal (petitioners) challenging an arbitral award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles....

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging an arbitral award dated 29 April 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Director’s Challenge to Arbitral Award in Factoring Facility Dispute — Upholds Award Despite Claims of Forged Guarantee and Procedural Lapses. Arbitral Tribunal’s Award Allowing SBI Global Factors’ Claim of Rs.43.45 Crores Jointly and Severally Against Guarantor and Principal Debtor Not Found Patent Illegality Under Section 34....

This judgment relates to a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Sanjeev Malhotra, a former director and shareholder of Rayalseema Commodities Ltd. (currentl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements....

The judgment originates from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Securitrans India Private Limited, seeking to set aside an arbitral award dated 3 May 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Mob Violence Case Due to Long Incarceration and Parity with Co-Accused. Continued detention held violative of Article 21 of the Constitution under Section 439 CrPC....

The applicants, Sunil @ Satya Shantaram Dalvi, Sajanya Barkya Burkud, and Vinod Ramu Rao, filed an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in connection wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in Mob Lynching Case — No Prima Facie Case for Murder. Applicant's Role Limited to Being Part of Unlawful Assembly Without Specific Overt Act....

The applicant, Rajesh Dhakal Rao, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release in connection with C.R. No.I-76 of 2020 registered at Kasa Police ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Dispute Over Common Passage in Residential Building. Court Holds That Disputed Passage Is Not an 'Open Space' Under MOFA Section 1A(e) and That the Suit Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata....

The appellants, Zenobia R. Poonawala and Rohinton Poonwala, are residents of Flat No.9 in Rutton Manor, a residential building in Colaba, Mumbai. They filed a suit against the respondents, including D...