High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Partition Suit — Defendants Challenge Partly-Decreed Judgment Under Section 96 CPC; Appeals Clubbed and Heard Together. The Division Bench Considers Whether Trial Court Rightly Granted Plaintiff Partial Relief in Suit for Partition, Declaration, and Injunction....

The judgment dealt with three Regular First Appeals preferred against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 in O.S.No.90/2014 by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Gokak. The sole plain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Rent and Business Income Recovery Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Section 100 CPC Appeal Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises....

The appellant, H.V. Devarajanaidu, was the defendant in O.S.No.312/2016 filed by the respondent, A.V. Ramesh Babu, for recovery of business income and arrears of rent amounting to Rs.3,20,000/- with i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Offence Against Minor Victim Under Section 377 IPC. Medical Evidence and Testimony of Grandmother Sufficient to Prove Guilt Despite Minor Inconsistencies....

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Datta Digambar Ingle, who was convicted under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code for committing an unnatural act on a three-year-old gir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Correct Cheque Number in Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Typographical Error in Cheque Number Can Be Amended to Ensure Fair Trial and Avoid Prejudice to Respondent....

The petitioner, Shankar Parshuram Choudhari, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Kolhapur, in Summary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA — Detenu Failed to Show Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority. The court held that the detaining authority had considered the retraction of statement and bail conditions, and the subjective satisfaction was valid....

The case involves a writ petition filed by a detenu challenging a detention order passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (CO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO Case on Compromise — Court Holds That When Victim Attains Majority and Parties Settle, Continuation of Prosecution Is Abuse of Process....

The petitioner, Faizal Salim Shaikh, was accused in Final Report No. 55 of 2019 arising out of C.R. No. 0105 of 2019 registered at Koregaon Park Police Station, Pune, for offences punishable under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Reject Election Petition and Amendment Plea in 189-Karjat Assembly Election. Examination Focuses on Compliance with Material Particulars Under Section 83 and Grounds Under Section 100 of RP Act and Order VII Rule 11 CPC....

The matter before the Bombay High Court concerned an election petition filed by Sudhakar Parshuram Ghare, an independent candidate from 189-Karjat Legislative Assembly Constituency, challenging the el...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Public Order Element. Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981....

The petitioner, Umesh Shivaji Vetal, challenged an order of detention dated 09.06.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar, under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Distant Relative in Dowry Harassment Case — No Specific Allegations of Cruelty or Dowry Demand. Applicant No. 3, maternal uncle of husband, was not residing with the couple and allegations pertained to service termination, not matrimonial cruelty under Section 498A IPC....

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by applicant No. 3, Narottam Purushottam Patil @ Subhash Purushottam Patil, seeking quashing of FI...