High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title. Declaration of Ownership Denied as Plaintiff Could Not Establish Exclusive Title Over Suit Properties Claimed as Self-Acquired....

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by his heirs) against the judgment of the Bombay City Civil Court dismissing his suit for declaration of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Consider Crucial Evidence and Breach of Contract Terms Constituted Patent Illegality Under Section 34(2A) of the Act....

The petitioner, National Co-operative Consumer’s Federation of India Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award passed in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference....

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose out of a contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal under Section 11 of Arbitration Act in Escrow Dispute; Abandonment of Arbitration Alleged. Dosti Group Contends That Petitioners' Participation in Parallel Suit Without Filing Section 8 Application Constitutes Ex Facie Abandonment Precluding Arbitration....

The matter arose from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated August 16, 2010, where the Dosti Group agreed to acquire a Target Company from the Kotharis for Rs. 59 crores. An Escrow Agreement dated Au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of consideration for shares, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The Petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated June 6, 2024. The dispute aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement, Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator....

The applicant, Vardhaman Builders, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising out of a Develop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 427 OF 2009...

The case concerns eviction proceedings initiated by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against the occupant, Niloufer Marshall, in respect of a flat and garage owned by LIC. The original te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Arbitral Award Upholding Initialled Joint Executing Agreement as Valid Arbitration Agreement. Initialling and Conduct Found to Evidence Mutual Assent, Establishing Binding Contract Under Section 7, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The dispute arose from a consortium formed by M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (M3), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (PPCL) to bid for an oil and gas development project...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which had set aside an arb...