High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Receiver in Share Dispute Due to Lack of Urgency and Alternative Remedy. Court holds that civil suit for specific performance and injunction is maintainable and no case for appointment of receiver under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC is made out when possession is not threatened and legal remedy is available....

The petitioner, Aakash Educational Services Limited, filed two writ petitions (WP-11425-2024 and WP-11426-2024) seeking appointment of a receiver under Order 40 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit, Holding Suit Not Barred by Limitation and Licensee Not Tenant, and Remands for Fresh Hearing. License Agreement Did Not Create Tenancy; Defendants Failed to Prove Protected Licensee Status Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act....

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 25.06.2003 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai, which s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Tenants' Challenge to MRT Order Reversing Restoration of Possession for Alleged Failure to Cultivate Under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Mutation of Land in Unmarried Sister's Name and Cultivation Through Hired Labour Examined in Light of Statutory Provisions and Evidence of Personal Cultivation....

The dispute centered on agricultural land Gat No. 547/1 in Maharashtra. Damodar was the original holder, and the predecessor-in-title of the petitioners was a tenant on the tillers’ day. Damodar’s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession and Mesne Profits Suit — First Appellate Court's Findings Set Aside as Perverse. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to re-appreciate evidence and ignored admissions, warranting interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

The plaintiff (appellant) filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against the defendant (respondent) in respect of a property in Kolhapur. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant was a licensee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal, Upholds Specific Performance Decree for Oral Agreement to Sell Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With as Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963....

This second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) alleged that defendant no.1 orally agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Limitation Upheld. Adverse Possession Plea Fails as Defendant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period....

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Anjanabai Rajaram Gore, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees of the trial court and first appellate court directing ...