High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark....

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., from infringing its registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor's Claims for Railway Maintenance Contract. Court upholds award on grounds of no patent illegality or perversity, finding that the arbitrator's decision was based on proper appreciation of evidence and contractual terms....

The petitioner, M/s. Amit Engineers, a government contractor, was awarded a work order by the Central Railway for an annual maintenance contract of RMPUs in AC coaches for a period of three years from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revision Applications by Original Defendants Seeking Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Limitation Held a Mixed Question of Law and Fact Requiring Trial; Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action Based on Discovery of Will in 2013, Suit Not Barred at Threshold....

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance and cancellation of documents concerning a large tract of land in Kothrud, Pune. The plaintiff, Rajesh Chandrakant Shinde, claimed rights under a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Loan Transaction. Court holds that a document styled as an agreement to sell cannot be recharacterized as a loan transaction without clear evidence of a loan and that the plaintiff must prove the agreement and readiness and willingness to perform....

The appellant (original plaintiff) filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st August 1996, whereby the respondent (original defendant) agreed to sell a flat for Rs. 6,50,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Locus Standi and Transparency Challenges in MIDC Land Allotment Case. Individual partner's writ petition held not maintainable due to lack of authorization from partnership firm; however, broader policy challenge regarding MIDC's online priority allotment without public advertisement kept open for consideration....

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the decisions of the Minor Modification Committee and Land Allotment Committee of MIDC to allot Open Spaces Nos. 8 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Sarpanch Disqualified for Taking Illegal Commercial Water Connection Without Sanction....

The petitioner, Ramdas Dattaraya Khose, was an elected member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Padalidariya. Respondents 7 to 9 filed an application under Section 14(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Village Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the trial court's findings on the existence of joint family property and the share of each party were based on proper appreciation of evidence and did not warrant interference under Section 115 of CPC....

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), against the judgment and decree dated 08.07.2019 passed by the Principal Court of Sma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Order VI Rule 17 CPC Amendment Permitted to Clarify Title and Boundaries. Pre-trial amendment allowed liberally as it did not change nature of suit and was necessary to determine real controversy between parties....

The petitioner, Syed Shakeel Ahamed, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 21.11.2020 passed by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Rejoinder to Amended Written Statement in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 9 CPC Permits Rejoinder to New Facts Raised in Amended Pleadings....

The present writ petition was filed by the defendant (Sri H.G. Shekar) challenging an order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the XXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-30) in O.S. No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Contractual Dispute Under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Objections on Limitation and Existence of Dispute....

The petitioner, M/S Santech Engineers Pvt Ltd, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to resol...