High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court's Partial Decree for Declaration, Injunction, and Partition. Appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and trial court's findings were based on proper appreciation of evidence under Section 96 CPC....

The case involves two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2021 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ron...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises for consideration when both courts below have concurrently found the plaintiff's possession and title based on evidence....

The present regular second appeal was filed by the defendants (appellants) under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 14.08.2013 passed by the Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title, Defendant's Adverse Possession Not Established. Court sets aside concurrent findings, holding that burden of proof on plaintiff to prove title was not discharged, and defendant's claim of adverse possession was not proved....

The appellant, Yallappa, was the defendant in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondent, Tangamma, in O.S. No. 19/2012 before the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Shahapur. The plaintif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds trial and appellate court decrees dismissing suit for declaration and injunction, finding no substantial question of law....

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property....

The case involves two regular second appeals filed by the appellants, Chanderakant and Suryakant, against the respondents, who are legal representatives of the original defendant. The appellants were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Inclusion in MPSC Merit List Based on Domicile Certificate — Petitioner Failed to Produce Domicile Certificate Before Cut-Off Date, No Right to Claim Inclusion After Deadline...

The petitioner, Mr. Sharad Bajirao Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur seeking a direction to the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) to include his name in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not a Conveyance Under Maharashtra Stamp Act. Agreement for lease with possession does not amount to conveyance under Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and stamp duty is payable under Article 36....

The petitioner, Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited, entered into a development agreement-cum-lease deed with respondent No. 3, CIDCO, on 31st March 2005. The agreement granted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Conciliation Officer to Admit Industrial Dispute in Proper Form, Criticizes Use of PMAS Meetings. Conciliation Officer's refusal to initiate proceedings on ground of improper format held improper; PMAS meetings not recognized under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....

The Petitioner Union raised demands on the Respondent Employer and served copies on the Conciliation Officer (Respondent No. 2). The Conciliation Officer did not initiate conciliation proceedings, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Domestic Violence Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Marriage Solemnized and Incident Occurred in Gujarat, Not Maharashtra. Section 27 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Requires Proceedings in Court Where Victim Resides or Incident Occurs....

The petitioner, an Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of an FIR and proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Settlement Reached Between Applicant and Informant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 126(2), 351(1), 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023....

The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2025 registered at Hinjewadi Police Station, Pune for offences un...