High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Andhra Pradesh Considers Legality of Ad-Interim Mandatory Injunction in Arbitration Act Case. Court Holds That Direction to Maintain Status Quo Ante Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Requires Reasons and Prima Facie Justification....

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh considered two commercial court appeals filed by Visakhapatnam Port Authority and its Chief Engineer challenging an ad-interim order dated 19.12.2025 passed by the Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Set-off of Fixed Deposit Against Loan Default Under SARFAESI Act. Bank's Right to Set-off Margin Money Fixed Deposit Against Outstanding Loan Upheld as Contractual and Statutory Right Under Section 171 of Contract Act and SARFAESI Act....

The writ petitioner, M/s Chithra Agencies Private Limited, an authorized dealer of Castrol India Ltd., availed cash credit facility from Canara Bank, Madurai, which was enhanced from Rs.13 crores to R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Assessee's Writ Appeals in GST Assessment and Rectification Matters Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Assessee's challenge to assessment order via writ petition while pursuing rectification under Section 161 of TNGST Act, 2017 held not maintainable; rectification order under Section 161 is appealable under Section 107....

The appellant, M/s SMG Enterprises and Engineering Contractor, challenged two orders: (1) an assessment order dated 27.08.2024 for the period 2019-2020 under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii)....

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a project named 'Deccan Enclave'. In the financial year relevant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition in Transport Corporation Service Matter Due to Compliance. Contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, closed after respondent complied with court order dated 25.07.2025 in W.P.No.27286 of 2025....

The petitioner, D. Annamalai, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii)....

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property named 'Deccan Enclave'. In the financial year relevant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Matter — Concurrent Findings of Eviction Upheld. Tenant's claim of lump-sum lease rejected; failure to register tenancy agreement under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 2017 leads to eviction under Section 21(2)(a)....

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the tenant, E.Mohan Raj, against the concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Rent Court (X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai) and the Rent Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in W.P.No.11857 of 2025 — Representation Favourably Considered. The court closed the contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as the respondents had complied with the earlier order by favourably considering the petitioner's representation....

The petitioner, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), represented by its Secretary, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobedienc...