High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disciplinary Action in ONGC Tender Irregularity Case. Court upholds chargesheet, punishment order, and appellate order against employee for unauthorizedly constituting tender committee to favor L2 bidder....

The petitioner, R.P. Gautam, an employee of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the chargesheet dated 21st Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Reinstatement of Investigating Officer in NDPS Case — Transfer of IO is an Administrative Decision Not Subject to Judicial Review Unless Malafide...

The petitioner, Salil Anupendra Chaturvedi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the transfer of Shri Ramesh D. Khade, Deputy Superintendent of Pol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of seven appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 70 of 1988. The appellants were convicted for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Allegation of Throwing Burning Kerosene Lamp Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Case Under Sections 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC....

The case arises from an incident on 18.3.2008 (Holi day) where the victim Rakesh Mankar, an 18-year-old student, sustained burn injuries. The prosecution alleged that appellant no.2 Alka Mankar threw ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated Beyond Three-Year Period Is Without Jurisdiction....

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tukaram Solunke, was an original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. He filed a return under Section 12 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notices Under Ceiling Act Due to Limitation. Additional Commissioner's power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within three years from the date of the original order; notices issued after 16 years are barred....

The petitioner, Balasaheb Bhaurao Muley, a resident of village Irlad, was the original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (the Ceiling ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Reopening Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Quashed as Issued After 16 Years....

The petitioner, Shivram A. Galbe, was a landholder in village Devegaon, Tq. Pathri, Dist. Parbhani. He filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable....

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act 1961. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction....

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. The Surplus...