High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Andhra Pradesh Heard Competing Writ Petitions on Demolition and Encroachment. One Writ Sought to Prevent Demolition Without Notice Under Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 and Constitution of India Articles 14, 21, 300-A, While Another Sought Removal of Unauthorized Construction Under Sections 192, 193, 360....

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati heard two writ petitions together involving adjacent landowners in Krishnapuram Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. In W.P.No.6879 of 2025...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Impleadment of Third Party in Suit for Injunction and Patta. Third Party Claiming Right of Way Over Government Poramboke Land Cannot Be Impleaded Without Individual Interest....

The petitioner filed a civil revision petition challenging the order of the Principal District Munsif Court at Gingee allowing the impleadment of the 1st respondent in a suit filed by the petitioner. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Impleadment of Third Party in Suit for Injunction and Patta. Third Party Claiming Right of Way Over Government Poramboke Land Cannot Be Impleaded in Individual Capacity Without Showing Individual Interest....

The petitioner filed a suit for bare injunction to restrain government officials from interfering with his possession and for a mandatory injunction directing them to grant a patta in his favour. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Mandatory Injunction in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Amendment Sought Based on Subsequent Construction During Pendency of Suit Not Barred by Limitation. The court held that amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is permissible when based on subsequent events and does not change the nature of the suit....

The Civil Revision Petition was filed by the petitioner, who is the 3rd defendant in the suit, challenging the order of the Principal District Munsif's Court, Kallakurichi, dated 18.02.2023, which all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Threat to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order....

The petitioner, Nikhil Bharatbhai Lakum, was preventively detained by an order dated 08.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 3(2) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Ranjitbhai @ Kotvar Nanubhai Pamak, through his friend Bambhaniya Rakesh Bhanabhai, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a preventive de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Was Unauthorized Passenger in Goods Vehicle, Insurance Company Not Liable. Claimant Husband Not Considered Dependent Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd against the judgment and award dated 07.03.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Kachchh, in Motor Accident Claim Petit...