High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Reasons on Counterclaim and Limitation. Arbitrator Must Provide Sufficient Reasons When Rejecting Counterclaim on Limitation and Merits Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Arun T. Gujrathi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 13.11.2009 passed by a sole arbitrator in a dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parole Extension for Life Convict in Open Prison Due to Daughter's Medical Emergency. Court Holds Overstay Not Willful and Directs No Coercive Action Pending Surrender....

The petitioner, Mahendra Digambarrao Deshmukh, a life convict lodged in Open Prison, Paithan, was granted parole by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad on 19th December 2011 for one month, with su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SC/ST Act Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside House, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989....

The appellant, Digambar Bhujang Kamble, was convicted by the trial court for an offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, for all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Quashing Proceedings Under Land Regulation Act Due to Pending Proceedings. Court Allows Petitioners to Raise Pleas Before Assistant Collector, Directing a Fresh Decision Within Three Months....

The case involved a writ petition filed by Ramdhan and others against the State of Haryana regarding proceedings under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. The petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Headmaster in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Alleged Sexual Harassment of Minor Student Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Turn Hostile and Material Contradictions Remain Unexplained Under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989....

The appellant, Kuwarlal Patle, was the headmaster of a Government Ashram School in Kadikasa, District Gondia. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Bhandara, in Special Case No. 22 of 2006 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed....

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Banking Ombudsman Dispute Over Counterfeit Drafts. Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Proceedings Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2002....

The petitioner, Bank of Baroda, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Banking Ombudsman (respondent no.2) in favor of respondent no.1, Vijaya Bank. The dispute arose from counterfeit drafts issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client....

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 2009 passed by a sole Arbitrator under the Byelaws o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Perversity and Lack of Counterclaim in Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Cannot Award Money in Favour of Non-Appearing Party Without Counterclaim Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The Union of India filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator in a dispute arising out of a construction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds in Light of SEBI Circulars Extending Limitation Period from Six Months to Three Years. The court remitted the matter to the Arbitral Tribunal for reconsideration of limitation under the extended period....

The petitioner, India Infoline Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 22 September 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tri...