High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'....

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the respondent, Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad, who used the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellants, Datta Ganpat Chandode and Shivram Vitthal Bhise, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of Dilip Shyamrao Gaikwad under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Compensation for Land Taken Possession Before Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Agreement for Compensation Between Landowners and Acquiring Body Enforced for Period from Possession to Award....

The petitioners, Ajinath, Bajirao, and Dhondiba Avhad, owned agricultural land in Mahinda, Taluka Ashti, District Beed. Their land was required for the construction of a village water tank, a public p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Land Acquired Without Following Procedure Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Possession Taken in 2003 Without Formal Acquisition; Court Orders Completion of Proceedings and Compensation with Interest....

The petitioner, Balbhim Shamrao Ghumare, owned agricultural lands in village Pargaon Ghumara, Taluka Patoda, District Beed. Part of his land was required for constructing a percolation tank. Responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witnesses for Cross-Examination in Criminal Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Procedural Delays. Accused Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine P.W. Nos. 3 and 4 Under Section 311 CrPC Despite Previous Recall and Absence of Counsel....

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Kishor Pannalal Gurarikar, the accused in Special Criminal Case No. 6 of 2010 pending before the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Suit on Valuation for Court Fee and Jurisdiction in Patent Ownership Dispute. Suit Valuation at Plaintiff's Discretion Under Sections 8 and 9 Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, Cannot Be Overruled Absent Evidence of Incorrect Valuation....

The suit was filed by Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck and another against Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and others seeking declarations, injunctions, and accounts regarding ownership and exploitation of patents. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Debenture Redemption Reserve Not a Reserve Under Section 115JA of Income Tax Act, 1961. Capital Expenditure on Steel Division Treated as Revenue Expenditure as It Was Incurred for Business Purposes....

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 13 February 2009 for Assessment Year 1997-98. Two questi...