High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Requirement Not Proved. The Court held that the landlord failed to establish reasonable and bonafide requirement for the suit premises under Section 32(4) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act....

The case involves a writ petition filed by the legal heirs of the original tenant, Dinanath Rama Naik, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Controller under the Goa, Daman and Diu Building (Le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Prospective Application of Section 234D. Interest Under Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Cannot Be Charged for Assessment Year 2002-03 as the Provision Applies Only From Assessment Year 2004-05....

The appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged an order dated 24/11/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.2201/Mum./2006 relating to assessment year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Allocation of R&D Expenses. ITAT's presumption of benefit from head office R&D expenses to manufacturing units without factual nexus is unsustainable under Income Tax Act, 1961....

The appellant, Zandu Pharmaceuticals Works Limited, is a company engaged in manufacturing ayurvedic medicines and ointments. It has a head office and four manufacturing units at Unnao, Vapi, Dadar, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Admission Under Rural Quota in MBBS Course — Strikes Down Arbitrary Eligibility Condition. Clause 3.2.4 of Prospectus Requiring Pre-High School Education in Same Village Held Unconstitutional as Violative of Article 14....

The petitioner, a doctor practicing in a rural village, filed a writ petition on behalf of her minor daughter Pranjal, challenging the denial of admission to the First Year MBBS course under the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 2012...

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by former employees of National Organic Chemicals Ltd. (NOCIL) against Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. (now Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd.) before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Blank Cheque Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands in favour of holder, and accused failed to rebut it by preponderance of probabilities....

The appellant, The Bagayatdar Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Vernon Vaz, alleging dishonour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Against Plaint Rejection in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Tenants Challenge Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act and MHADA Act....

The case involved multiple civil revision applications filed by tenants of Laxmi Building, Mumbai, before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the rejection of their plaints by the Smal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Reference on Difference of Opinion in Municipal Tax Assessment Case. Question of law regarding determination of annual letting value under Section 154 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for premises exempt under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999....

This judgment is a reference to a third judge following a difference of opinion in an appeal against a Single Judge's decision in a writ petition concerning property tax assessment under the Mumbai Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellants, Gopinath, Kashinath, and Shashikala @ Sheshabai, were convicted by the trial court for the murder of a person under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenc...