High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Stock Exchange Membership Dispute — Upholds Resolution Declaring Member Defaulter for Non-Payment of Security Deposit. Resolution Passed by Council of Management Valid Under Bye-Law 312 and Articles of Association....

The appellant, Sanjay Munot, was a member of the Pune Stock Exchange Limited (the respondent company) and carried on business as a share broker. In 1997, he decided to contest elections for the Counci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Dead Body and Articles Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The appellant, Bhagwan alias Bapu Narhari Bondre, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences punishable under Sections 302, 392 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, and senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council Against Levy of Entertainment Duty on Business Exhibitions. Business-to-business trade shows with restricted entry are not 'entertainment' under Section 2(5) of the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no duty is leviable under Sections 3 and 4(2)....

The Petitioner, The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organizes annual business-to-business exhibitions titled 'IIJS' and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Competing Claims Over Water Allocation from Upper Wardha Dam and Considers Constitutional Validity of Article 371(2) Governor’s Directives. Court Directs Interim Water Supply for 2012-13 and Frames Issues on Legality of Allocation and Binding Nature of Directives but Final Decision Not Contained in Available Text....

The dispute arose from the allocation of 87.60 million cubic meters (MCM) of water from the Upper Wardha Dam in Amravati district, Maharashtra, to a thermal power project of M/s. Sofia Power Company L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Bank Suit Rejection Case — Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Appellant's Suits for Declaration and Injunction Against Bank's Auction Notice Held Barred by Limitation and Lack of Cause of Action....

The appellant, Yashavant S/o Laxman Sable, filed a series of Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against orders dated 26.02.2010 passed by the Principal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction....

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions by Cable TV Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option and Imposition of Tax on Monthly Subscriptions. Amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D of Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958, Held Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A of Constitution....

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable television services in Karnataka. They filed writ pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A....

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable television services. They filed writ petitions under ...