Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In

High Court

Home High Court
Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Exclusion of Counter-Claim for Damages in Divorce Petition Under Law of Divorce. Article 15 of Law of Divorce does not permit counter-claim for damages, and the provision stands repealed by Section 4(1) of the Goa, Daman and Diu (Extension of the Code of CPC and the Arbitration) Act, 1940....

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kiru Sadashiv Porob alias Ajit Sadashiv Porob challenging an order dated 25.2.2013 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Mapusa, which allowed an application und...

By Admin
  • 184
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Twelve Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from authorities, shareholders, or creditors....

This judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction filed by Santorini Realty Private Limited, the twelfth transferor company, seeking sanction of a scheme of amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394...

By Admin
  • 137
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court dispenses with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to written consent and no objections from authorities....

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 340 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. The applicant, B. Raheja Infrastructure Private Lim...

By Admin
  • 243
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court found scheme fair and reasonable, no objections from Regional Director or Official Liquidator, and no prejudice to shareholders or creditors....

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 337 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. The applicant, Advantage Raheja Properties Private ...

By Admin
  • 218
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — No Objection from Regional Director or Official Liquidator....

This is a judgment of the Bombay High Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, in a Company Summons for Direction No. 335 of 2014. The applicant, Advantage Raheja Infraprojects Private Limited (th...

By Admin
  • 208
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court approved the amalgamation of 18 transferor companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited, finding the scheme fair and compliant with statutory requirements....

The judgment pertains to a Company Summons for Direction No. 334 of 2014 filed before the Bombay High Court under the Companies Act, 1956. The applicant, Advantage Raheja Hospitality Private Limited (...

By Admin
  • 106
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from stakeholders, thus approving the amalgamation....

The Bombay High Court considered a Company Summons for Direction filed by Advantage Raheja Developers Private Limited, one of the Transferor Companies, seeking sanction of a scheme of amalgamation und...

By Admin
  • 205
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court dispensed with meetings and approved the scheme as fair and reasonable with no objections from regulatory authorities....

This is a judgment by the Bombay High Court on a Company Summons for Direction filed by Advantage Raheja Construction Private Limited, one of the Transferor Companies, seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

By Admin
  • 154
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited Under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court approved the amalgamation after noting compliance with statutory requirements and absence of objections from shareholders and creditors....

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction No. 330 of 2014 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under the Companies Act, 1956. The applicant, Galleria Developers Private Limited,...

By Admin
  • 117
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found the scheme fair and reasonable, with no objections from statutory authorities, and ordered dissolution of Transferor Companies without winding up....

The applicant, Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited (Transferee Company), filed a Company Summons for Direction No. 345 of 2014 under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction ...

By Admin
  • 145
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation Land Acquisition burden of proof Jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Order for Appointment of Exc...

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Enforcement Directorate Actions in Multiple Writ Petitions...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Civil Works Contract. The Court fou...

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employees in Public Service — Validity of...

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process in Forest Areas While Ensuring Compliance with Fore...

Lost Your Password?